Rhonda R. Snook

6.5k total citations
89 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Rhonda R. Snook is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rhonda R. Snook has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 75 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 64 papers in Genetics and 12 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Rhonda R. Snook's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (68 papers), Plant and animal studies (58 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (51 papers). Rhonda R. Snook is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (68 papers), Plant and animal studies (58 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (51 papers). Rhonda R. Snook collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Rhonda R. Snook's co-authors include Timothy L. Karr, David J. Hosken, Tommaso Pizzari, Helen S. Crudgington, Luke Holman, Tom A. R. Price, Amanda Bretman, Therese A. Markow, Michael G. Ritchie and Benjamin S. Walsh and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Rhonda R. Snook

87 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rhonda R. Snook United Kingdom 32 2.6k 2.0k 660 639 276 89 3.5k
Amanda Bretman United Kingdom 33 2.4k 1.0× 1.9k 1.0× 489 0.7× 654 1.0× 111 0.4× 64 3.2k
Laura K. Sirot United States 23 1.8k 0.7× 1.6k 0.8× 227 0.3× 956 1.5× 357 1.3× 40 2.9k
Jeanne A. Zeh United States 27 1.8k 0.7× 1.2k 0.6× 594 0.9× 414 0.6× 292 1.1× 49 2.7k
Francisco García–González Australia 28 2.0k 0.8× 1.3k 0.6× 415 0.6× 412 0.6× 65 0.2× 69 2.5k
David W. Zeh United States 29 2.1k 0.8× 1.4k 0.7× 646 1.0× 545 0.9× 357 1.3× 58 3.1k
Stefan Lüpold Switzerland 30 2.3k 0.9× 1.2k 0.6× 645 1.0× 233 0.4× 90 0.3× 74 2.7k
G. de Jong Netherlands 9 1.5k 0.6× 793 0.4× 928 1.4× 290 0.5× 112 0.4× 14 2.6k
Mollie K. Manier United States 21 1.3k 0.5× 1.1k 0.5× 350 0.5× 194 0.3× 112 0.4× 30 1.8k
Oliver Y. Martin Switzerland 27 1.5k 0.6× 1.2k 0.6× 327 0.5× 896 1.4× 128 0.5× 69 2.3k
Aneil F. Agrawal Canada 39 2.7k 1.0× 3.2k 1.6× 753 1.1× 628 1.0× 586 2.1× 100 4.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Rhonda R. Snook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rhonda R. Snook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhonda R. Snook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhonda R. Snook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rhonda R. Snook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhonda R. Snook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhonda R. Snook. The network helps show where Rhonda R. Snook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rhonda R. Snook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rhonda R. Snook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rhonda R. Snook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rhonda R. Snook. Rhonda R. Snook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Snook, Rhonda R., et al.. (2025). Elevated temperatures have sex-specific effects on nuptial gift behavior. Behavioral Ecology. 36(4). araf049–araf049. 2 indexed citations
2.
Hoedjes, Katja M., Sonja Grath, Nico Posnien, et al.. (2024). From whole bodies to single cells: A guide to transcriptomic approaches for ecology and evolutionary biology. Molecular Ecology. 34(15). e17382–e17382. 6 indexed citations
3.
Lüpold, Stefan, et al.. (2024). One size does not fit all: female–male interactions on the path to fertilization. Reproduction. 169(2).
4.
Snook, Rhonda R., et al.. (2023). Selection on the Fly: Short-Term Adaptation to an Altered Sexual Selection Regime in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genome Biology and Evolution. 15(7). 3 indexed citations
5.
Baur, Julian, et al.. (2023). Heat stress reveals a fertility debt owing to postcopulatory sexual selection. Evolution Letters. 8(1). 101–113. 9 indexed citations
7.
Albrecht, Tomáš, Erica L. Larson, Leonie C. Moyle, et al.. (2023). Synthesis and Scope of the Role of Postmating Prezygotic Isolation in Speciation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 16(10). a041429–a041429. 13 indexed citations
8.
Veltsos, Paris, et al.. (2022). Experimental sexual selection reveals rapid evolutionary divergence in sex‐specific transcriptomes and their interactions following mating. Molecular Ecology. 31(12). 3374–3388. 10 indexed citations
9.
Holman, Luke, et al.. (2022). Experimental sexual selection affects the evolution of physiological and life‐history traits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 35(5). 742–751. 6 indexed citations
10.
Beckerman, Andrew P., et al.. (2022). Experimental evolution of local adaptation under unidimensional and multidimensional selection. Current Biology. 32(6). 1310–1318.e4. 13 indexed citations
11.
Kahrl, Ariel F., Rhonda R. Snook, & John L. Fitzpatrick. (2022). Fertilization mode differentially impacts the evolution of vertebrate sperm components. Nature Communications. 13(1). 6809–6809. 14 indexed citations
12.
Parratt, Steven R., Benjamin S. Walsh, Soeren Metelmann, et al.. (2021). Temperatures that sterilize males better match global species distributions than lethal temperatures. Nature Climate Change. 11(6). 481–484. 104 indexed citations
13.
Ritchie, Michael G., et al.. (2020). Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 375(1813). 20200071–20200071. 9 indexed citations
14.
Evans, Caroline A., et al.. (2020). Seminal fluid protein divergence among populations exhibiting postmating prezygotic reproductive isolation. Molecular Ecology. 29(22). 4428–4441. 14 indexed citations
15.
Snook, Rhonda R., et al.. (2019). The Past and Future of Experimental Speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 35(1). 10–21. 32 indexed citations
16.
Debelle, Allan, Michael G. Ritchie, & Rhonda R. Snook. (2016). Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 29(7). 1307–1316. 16 indexed citations
17.
Price, Tom A. R., et al.. (2008). SEX RATIO DISTORTER REDUCES SPERM COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN AN INSECT. Evolution. 62(7). 1644–1652. 56 indexed citations
18.
Holman, Luke & Rhonda R. Snook. (2008). A Sterile Sperm Caste Protects Brother Fertile Sperm from Female-Mediated Death in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Current Biology. 18(4). 292–296. 67 indexed citations
19.
Snook, Rhonda R. & Timothy L. Karr. (1998). Only long sperm are fertilization-competent in six sperm-heteromorphic Drosophila species. Current Biology. 8(5). 291–294. 77 indexed citations
20.
Yunger, John A., Richard G. Brewer, & Rhonda R. Snook. (1992). A method for decreasing trap mortality of Sorex. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 106(2). 249–251. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026