Tony Pipe

151 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Tony Pipe
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Human-Computer Interaction 173
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 608
  • Control and Systems Engineering 673
  • Biomedical Engineering 717
  • Artificial Intelligence 489
Replace Max Lungarella with:
Max Lungarella Switzerland
Rui Yan China
Takamitsu Matsubara Japan
Yoky Matsuoka United States
Koh Hosoda Japan
Francesco Nori Italy
Jochen J. Steil Germany
Laxmidhar Behera India
Majid Nili Ahmadabadi Iran
David Vernon Ireland
Tony Pipe relative to Max Lungarella Switzerland Max Lungarella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Max Lungarella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tony Pipe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tony Pipe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tony Pipe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tony Pipe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tony Pipe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tony Pipe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tony Pipe. The network helps show where Tony Pipe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tony Pipe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tony Pipe Line = papers co-authored together Tony Pipe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 159 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012165
2 2009105
3
Development of a tactile sensor based on biologically inspired edge encoding
2009104
4 201393
5 200792
6
Biomimetics: Nature-Based Innovation
201191
7 200982
8 201175
9 201357
10 200756
11 200453
12 201045
13 200941
14 201339
15 200938
16 201437
17 201035
18 201235
19 201034
20 201234

About Tony Pipe

Tony Pipe is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 159 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (27 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (26 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (21 papers), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (17 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (16 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (16 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers) and Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (173 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (608 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (673 citations), Biomedical Engineering (717 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (489 citations). Tony Pipe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Chris Melhuish, Martin J. Pearson, Ben Mitchinson, Tony J. Prescott, Guido Herrmann, Said Ghani Khan, Jonathan Rossiter, Charles Sullivan, Paul Bremner and Frank L. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Robotics and Autonomous Systems, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Autonomous Robots and Adaptive Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact