Tonia Sutherland
Impact in
-
- Library Science and Administration
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Conservation top 2%
- Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 3
- Information Systems Theories and Implementation 3
-
- Digital and Traditional Archives Management 6
- Co-authors
- Niloufar Salehi (2 shared papers)Marika Cifor (3 shared papers)Patricia Martínez García (2 shared papers)Anita Chan (1 shared paper)Catherine D’Ignazio (1 shared paper)Lauren Klein (1 shared paper)Amelia Acker (1 shared paper)R. G. Kauffman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Black Scholar (3 papers)Library trends (1 paper)Radical History Review (1 paper)Journal of Animal Science (1 paper)New Media & Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Tonia Sutherland
23 papers receiving 211 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Library and Information Sciences 29
- Conservation 44
- Space and Planetary Science 14
- Human-Computer Interaction 24
- Safety Research 35
Countries citing papers authored by Tonia Sutherland
This map shows the geographic impact of Tonia Sutherland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tonia Sutherland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tonia Sutherland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tonia Sutherland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tonia Sutherland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tonia Sutherland. The network helps show where Tonia Sutherland may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Tonia Sutherland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 1 |
About Tonia Sutherland
Tonia Sutherland is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Conservation, Music, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital and Traditional Archives Management (6 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (3 papers), Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis (2 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (29 citations), Conservation (44 citations), Space and Planetary Science (14 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (24 citations) and Safety Research (35 citations). Tonia Sutherland has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Niloufar Salehi, Marika Cifor, Patricia Martínez García, Anita Chan, Catherine D’Ignazio, Lauren Klein, Amelia Acker, R. G. Kauffman, Stacy Wood and Michelle Caswell. Their work appears in journals such as The Black Scholar, Library trends, Radical History Review, Journal of Animal Science and New Media & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.