Radical History Review

1.3k papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Radical History Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Radical History Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (619 papers), History (234 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (177 papers) specifically the topics of Race, History, and American Society (168 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (85 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Radical History Review are Susan Stryker, Paul Buhle, Amy Kaplan, Micol Seigel, Hazel V. Carby, Michael Merrill, Michael Rogin, Ann Snitow, Martin F. Manalansan and Michael Wallace.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Radical History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Radical History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Radical History Review.

Countries where authors publish in Radical History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Radical History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Radical History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radical History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025