Ton Nabben

537 citations
24 papers · 358 indexed · h-index 9

Ton Nabben

20 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Ton Nabben
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Toxicology 84
  • Epidemiology 81
  • Neurology 70
  • Rheumatology 57
  • Clinical Psychology 45
Replace Jon Waldron with:
Jon Waldron United Kingdom
Sylvie Deheul France
Leon Rozin United States
Sanjeet Narang United States
Cécile Sabourdy France
Alison Welch United States
Cynthia Chan Canada
Mary Rosenzweig Denmark
Chia-Jui Tsai Taiwan
Michael A. Ueberall Germany
Ton Nabben relative to Jon Waldron United Kingdom Jon Waldron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jon Waldron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ton Nabben

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ton Nabben's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ton Nabben with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ton Nabben more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ton Nabben

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ton Nabben. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ton Nabben. The network helps show where Ton Nabben may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ton Nabben

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ton Nabben. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ton Nabben based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ton Nabben. Ton Nabben is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 7
3 18
4 3
5 27
6 3
7 21
8 7
9
Waterbed, drukte en overlast: Effecten Sluitingsbeleid Coffeeshops in Amsterdam-Centrum
5
10 30
11 161
12
Drug use trends in Amsterdam nightlife, 2013
1
13 1
14 12
15
Coffeeshop, overlast en illegale markt: de gevolgen van de komst van een coffeeshop in Lelystad
2
16
Trends and patterns in licit and illicit drug use in nightlife and among secondary school pupils in Amsterdam, 2011
2
17 5
18
Antenne 2008: trends in alcohol, tabak en drugs bij jonge Amsterdammers
8
19
Antenne 2006: trends in alcohol, tabak en drugs bij jonge Amsterdammers
10
20 20

About Ton Nabben

Ton Nabben is a scholar working on Toxicology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Law, having authored 24 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (7 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (5 papers) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (84 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (23 citations) and Neurology (70 citations). Ton Nabben has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Poland and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Jan van Amsterdam, Wim van den Brink, Dirk J. Korf, Annemieke Benschop, Katalin Felvinczi, Marie Claire Van Hout, Łukasz Wieczorek, Nienke Liebregts, Evelyn Hearne and Katarzyna Dąbrowska. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Psychopharmacology and Forensic Science International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026