Jan van Amsterdam
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Physiology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Wim van den BrinkAntoon OpperhuizenTibor M. BruntReinskje TalhoutTon NabbenFred HartgensW. VleemingPeter A. Steerenberg
- Topics
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (20 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers)Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (17 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsEnvironmental Health Perspectives
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jan van Amsterdam
121 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
- Clinical Psychology 609
- Pharmacology 604
- Physiology 558
- Molecular Biology 527
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 521
Countries citing papers authored by Jan van Amsterdam
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan van Amsterdam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan van Amsterdam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan van Amsterdam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan van Amsterdam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan van Amsterdam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan van Amsterdam. The network helps show where Jan van Amsterdam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan van Amsterdam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan van Amsterdam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan van Amsterdam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan van Amsterdam. Jan van Amsterdam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Steep increase in prescribed opioids in the Netherlands. Are we going the same way as the U.S. | 1 |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 92 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 55 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | Cannabis als risicofactor van schizofrenie | 1 |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 50 | |
| 19 | 187 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Jan van Amsterdam
Jan van Amsterdam is a scholar working on Toxicology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 122 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (20 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (483 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (198 citations) and Pharmacology (604 citations). Jan van Amsterdam has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wim van den Brink, Antoon Opperhuizen, Tibor M. Brunt, Reinskje Talhout, Ton Nabben, Fred Hartgens, W. Vleeming, Peter A. Steerenberg, Miranda Olff and Dick J. De Wildt. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Environmental Health Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.