Tomos Proffitt

38 papers receiving 814 citations

Peers

Tomos Proffitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Archeology 65
  • Anthropology 582
  • Paleontology 308
  • Developmental Biology 75
  • Social Psychology 428
Replace Adrián Arroyo with:
Adrián Arroyo Spain
Mzalendo Kibunjia Kenya
Andrew Du United States
Briana Pobiner United States
Tamara Dogandžić Germany
Bruce Hardy United States
Matthew W. Tocheri United States
Rolf Quam Spain
Jonathan S. Reeves Germany
Dominique Gommery France
Tomos Proffitt relative to Adrián Arroyo Spain Adrián Arroyo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Adrián Arroyo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomos Proffitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomos Proffitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomos Proffitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomos Proffitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomos Proffitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomos Proffitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomos Proffitt. The network helps show where Tomos Proffitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomos Proffitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomos Proffitt Line = papers co-authored together Tomos Proffitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016117
2 201284
3 201658
4 201954
5 202035
6 201734
7 201532
8 201431
9 201830
10 201829
11 201829
12 201629
13 202327
14 201824
15 201423
16 201720
17 202218
18 201917
19 201715
20 202115

About Tomos Proffitt

Tomos Proffitt is a scholar working on Anthropology, Social Psychology, Paleontology, Ecology and Archeology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (34 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (24 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (13 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (9 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (9 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (6 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (4 papers) and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (65 citations), Anthropology (582 citations), Paleontology (308 citations), Developmental Biology (75 citations) and Social Psychology (428 citations). Tomos Proffitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ignacio de la Torre, Lydia V. Luncz, Michael Haslam, Alastair Key, Adrián Arroyo, Tiago Falótico, Eduardo Β. Ottoni, Alfonso Benito‐Calvo, Suchinda Malaivijitnond and Jonathan S. Reeves. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Human Evolution, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, Journal of Archaeological Science, Royal Society Open Science and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact