Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cultures in chimpanzees
19991.4k citationsRichard W. Wrangham, Christophe Boesch et al.profile →
Fission‐Fusion Dynamics
2008695 citationsChristophe Boesch et al.profile →
Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park
1989640 citationsChristophe Boesch et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Christophe Boesch
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christophe Boesch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christophe Boesch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christophe Boesch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christophe Boesch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christophe Boesch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christophe Boesch. The network helps show where Christophe Boesch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christophe Boesch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christophe Boesch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christophe Boesch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christophe Boesch. Christophe Boesch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wilson, Michael L., Christophe Boesch, Takeshi Furuichi, et al.. (2012). Rates of lethal aggression in chimpanzees depend on the number of adult males rather than measures of human disturbance.3 indexed citations
Smith, B. Holly & Christophe Boesch. (2010). Magnitude of the "wild effect" in tooth emergence in chimpanzees of the Tai and Gombe forests. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.1 indexed citations
Hohmann, Gottfried, Christophe Boesch, & Martha M. Robbins. (2006). Feeding ecology in apes and other primates : ecological, physical, and behavioral aspects. Cambridge University Press eBooks.170 indexed citations
15.
Bakarr, Mohamed I., Christophe Boesch, Thomas M. Butynski, & Rebecca Kormos. (2004). Chimpanzés d'Afrique de l'Ouest : état de conservation de l'espèce et plan d'action. IUCN eBooks.1 indexed citations
16.
Kormos, Rebecca, Christophe Boesch, Mohamed I. Bakarr, & Thomas M. Butynski. (2003). West African chimpanzees : status survey and conservation action plan. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.90 indexed citations
17.
Wittig, Roman M. & Christophe Boesch. (2003). Linear dominance hierarchy due to contest competition among female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus). Folia Primatologica. 229–230.1 indexed citations
Boesch, Christophe & Hedwige Boesch‐Achermann. (1991). Dim Forest, Bright Chimps. In the Rain Forest of Ivory Coast, Chimpanzees Meet the Challenge of Life by Hunting Cooperatively and Using Crude Tools. Natural history. 50–57.1 indexed citations
20.
Dubois-Randé, J L, Christian Hervé, Anne-Marie Duval-Moulin, et al.. (1989). [Prehospital thrombolysis. Evaluation of preliminary experiences at Val-de-Marne].. PubMed. 82(12). 1963–6.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.