Tomas Ståhl

918 total citations
23 papers, 574 citations indexed

About

Tomas Ståhl is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tomas Ståhl has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 574 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tomas Ståhl's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers). Tomas Ståhl is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers). Tomas Ståhl collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Tomas Ståhl's co-authors include Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Naomi Ellemers, Colette van Laar, Belle Derks, Daniel Eek, Ali Kazemi, Riël Vermunt, Linda J. Skitka, Paul A. M. Van Lange and Thomas Arciszewski and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Tomas Ståhl

22 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tomas Ståhl Netherlands 12 434 200 181 78 61 23 574
Geoffrey Wetherell United States 12 641 1.5× 173 0.9× 392 2.2× 39 0.5× 58 1.0× 23 791
Boaz Hameiri Israel 16 601 1.4× 151 0.8× 330 1.8× 66 0.8× 25 0.4× 51 768
G. Scott Morgan United States 11 602 1.4× 236 1.2× 348 1.9× 45 0.6× 34 0.6× 14 776
Martin V. Day Canada 9 368 0.8× 120 0.6× 223 1.2× 30 0.4× 33 0.5× 16 518
Angela T. Maitner United States 13 590 1.4× 157 0.8× 469 2.6× 70 0.9× 25 0.4× 22 844
B. Michelle Peruche United States 7 539 1.2× 137 0.7× 234 1.3× 91 1.2× 92 1.5× 7 695
Ángel Gómez Spain 2 513 1.2× 117 0.6× 389 2.1× 37 0.5× 47 0.8× 2 670
Jennifer Ferrell United Kingdom 11 398 0.9× 186 0.9× 352 1.9× 42 0.5× 23 0.4× 12 721
Mary L. Inman United States 11 543 1.3× 107 0.5× 309 1.7× 63 0.8× 30 0.5× 19 697
Jimmy Calanchini United States 13 402 0.9× 119 0.6× 237 1.3× 63 0.8× 32 0.5× 34 560

Countries citing papers authored by Tomas Ståhl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomas Ståhl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomas Ståhl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomas Ståhl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomas Ståhl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomas Ståhl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomas Ståhl. The network helps show where Tomas Ståhl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tomas Ståhl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tomas Ståhl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tomas Ståhl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tomas Ståhl. Tomas Ståhl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ståhl, Tomas, et al.. (2025). Pro‐Science Beliefs: The Role of Analytic Thinking and Epistemic Values. PubMed. 66(5). 702–716. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ståhl, Tomas & Corey Cusimano. (2023). Lay standards for reasoning predict people's acceptance of suspect claims. Current Opinion in Psychology. 55. 101727–101727. 2 indexed citations
3.
Ståhl, Tomas & James Turner. (2021). Epistemic values and the Big Five: Personality characteristics of those who ascribe personal and moral value to epistemic rationality. PLoS ONE. 16(10). e0258228–e0258228. 3 indexed citations
4.
5.
Ståhl, Tomas & Jan‐Willem van Prooijen. (2021). Analytic atheism: Valuing epistemic rationality strengthens the association between analytic thinking and religious disbelief. Personality and Individual Differences. 179. 110914–110914. 6 indexed citations
6.
Adam‐Troian, Jaïs, et al.. (2019). Unfounded beliefs among teachers: The interactive role of rationality priming and cognitive ability. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 33(4). 720–727. 27 indexed citations
7.
Ståhl, Tomas & Jan‐Willem van Prooijen. (2017). Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences. 122. 155–163. 142 indexed citations
8.
Ståhl, Tomas, et al.. (2016). Moralized Rationality: Relying on Logic and Evidence in the Formation and Evaluation of Belief Can Be Seen as a Moral Issue. PLoS ONE. 11(11). e0166332–e0166332. 49 indexed citations
9.
Ståhl, Tomas & Naomi Ellemers. (2016). Ironic Effects of Moral Motivation: Why Working Toward a Moral Goal Reduces Subsequent Perspective Taking. Social Cognition. 34(2). 133–148. 5 indexed citations
10.
Ståhl, Tomas, Colette van Laar, & Naomi Ellemers. (2012). The role of prevention focus under stereotype threat: Initial cognitive mobilization is followed by depletion.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102(6). 1239–1251. 65 indexed citations
11.
Prooijen, Jan‐Willem van, Tomas Ståhl, Daniel Eek, & Paul A. M. Van Lange. (2012). Injustice for All or Just for Me? Social Value Orientation Predicts Responses to Own Versus Other’s Procedures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 38(10). 1247–1258. 15 indexed citations
12.
Ståhl, Tomas, Colette van Laar, Naomi Ellemers, & Belle Derks. (2012). Searching for acceptance: Prejudice expectations direct attention towards social acceptance cues when under a promotion focus. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 15(4). 523–538. 9 indexed citations
13.
Laar, Colette van, et al.. (2011). Social change as an important goal or likely outcome: How regulatory focus affects commitment to collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology. 51(1). 93–110. 22 indexed citations
14.
Laar, Colette van, et al.. (2011). By any means necessary: The effects of regulatory focus and moral conviction on hostile and benevolent forms of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology. 50(4). 670–689. 67 indexed citations
15.
Ståhl, Tomas, Daniel Eek, & Ali Kazemi. (2010). Rape Victim Blaming as System Justification: The Role of Gender and Activation of Complementary Stereotypes. Social Justice Research. 23(4). 239–258. 52 indexed citations
16.
Prooijen, Jan‐Willem van, David De Cremer, Ilja van Beest, et al.. (2008). The egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 44(5). 1303–1315. 34 indexed citations
17.
Ståhl, Tomas, Riël Vermunt, & Naomi Ellemers. (2007). For love or money? How activation of relational versus instrumental concerns affects reactions to decision-making procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 44(1). 80–94. 5 indexed citations
18.
Ståhl, Tomas, Riël Vermunt, & Naomi Ellemers. (2006). Friend or foe? Ingroup identification moderates reactions to outgroup members' allocation behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology. 36(6). 877–885. 8 indexed citations
19.
Ståhl, Tomas. (2006). Determinants of fairness-based and favorability-based reactions to authorities' decisions. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 2 indexed citations
20.
Ståhl, Tomas, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, & Riël Vermunt. (2004). On the psychology of procedural justice: reactions to procedures of ingroup vs. outgroup authorities. European Journal of Social Psychology. 34(2). 173–189. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Geoffrey Wetherell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Boaz Hameiri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Scott Morgan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martin V. Day Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angela T. Maitner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. Michelle Peruche Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ángel Gómez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer Ferrell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary L. Inman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jimmy Calanchini
Rankless by CCL
2026