Daniel Eek

2.0k total citations
48 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Daniel Eek is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Eek has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 16 papers in Safety Research and 4 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Daniel Eek's work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (15 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers). Daniel Eek is often cited by papers focused on Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (15 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers). Daniel Eek collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom. Daniel Eek's co-authors include Bo Rothstein, Tommy Gärling, Anders Biel, Meaghan Krohe, Satoshi Fujii, Alan L. Shields, Peter Loukopoulos, Iyar Mazar, Farrah Pompilus and Ali Kazemi and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Eek

47 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Eek Sweden 18 415 176 165 142 102 48 1.2k
Gregor Wolbring Canada 25 644 1.6× 650 3.7× 54 0.3× 54 0.4× 65 0.6× 145 2.4k
Peter J. Robertson United States 27 452 1.1× 84 0.5× 142 0.9× 15 0.1× 38 0.4× 89 3.4k
Tuyen Quang Tran Vietnam 21 340 0.8× 88 0.5× 479 2.9× 13 0.1× 19 0.2× 109 1.4k
Bingqin Li Australia 26 596 1.4× 41 0.2× 190 1.2× 73 0.5× 13 0.1× 106 1.9k
Abigail Davis United Kingdom 13 108 0.3× 98 0.6× 43 0.3× 64 0.5× 37 0.4× 43 501
Kathleen Wilson United States 18 262 0.6× 30 0.2× 110 0.7× 22 0.2× 26 0.3× 54 2.1k
Malcolm Hill United Kingdom 28 1.4k 3.3× 552 3.1× 54 0.3× 18 0.1× 36 0.4× 164 3.2k
Ghulam Warsi United States 17 294 0.7× 54 0.3× 124 0.8× 19 0.1× 650 6.4× 36 2.4k
Colin Thomas United States 20 293 0.7× 18 0.1× 143 0.9× 268 1.9× 175 1.7× 54 1.3k
Kevin F. McCarthy United States 21 552 1.3× 18 0.1× 188 1.1× 35 0.2× 26 0.3× 86 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Eek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Eek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Eek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Eek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Eek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Eek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Eek. The network helps show where Daniel Eek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Eek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Eek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Eek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Eek. Daniel Eek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Parodis, Ioannis, et al.. (2024). O20 Lupus low disease activity state and organ damage in relation to quality of life in SLE: a cohort study with up to 11 years of follow-up. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. A21–A21. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wolpert, Elisabeth Z., et al.. (2023). How do patients experience chronic kidney disease? A mixed-methods study among patients in Sweden. Journal of Public Health. 32(10). 2015–2025. 4 indexed citations
4.
Liljeroos, Maria, et al.. (2023). Experiences of Heart Failure and the Treatment Journey: A Mixed-Methods Study Among Patients with Heart Failure in Sweden. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 17. 1935–1947. 2 indexed citations
5.
7.
Eek, Daniel, et al.. (2020). Development of a Conceptual Model of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia to Better Understand the Patient Experience. Patient. 14(1). 75–87. 4 indexed citations
8.
Martin, Mona L., Katarina Halling, Daniel Eek, & Matthew Reaney. (2019). “Lower abdominal pains, as if I was being squeezed…in a clamp”: A Qualitative Analysis of Symptoms, Patient-Perceived Side Effects and Impacts of Ovarian Cancer. Patient. 13(2). 189–200. 6 indexed citations
9.
Condon, David, Robert S. Chapman, Sara Shaunfield, et al.. (2019). Does recall period matter? Comparing PROMIS® physical function with no recall, 24-hr recall, and 7-day recall. Quality of Life Research. 29(3). 745–753. 23 indexed citations
10.
Butler, Stephen, et al.. (2018). The utility/futility of medications for neuropathic pain – an observational study. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 19(2). 327–335. 7 indexed citations
11.
Wang, Victor, Morgan Hanger, Michael Levy, et al.. (2017). Patient perspectives on neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Data from the PatientsLikeMe online community. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 17. 116–122. 42 indexed citations
12.
Martin, Mona L., Katarina Halling, Daniel Eek, Meaghan Krohe, & Jean Paty. (2017). Understanding polycystic ovary syndrome from the patient perspective: a concept elicitation patient interview study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 15(1). 162–162. 22 indexed citations
13.
Kazemi, Ali, Daniel Eek, & Tommy Gärling. (2017). Equity, Equal Shares or Equal Final Outcomes? Group Goal Guides Allocations of Public Goods. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 36–36. 3 indexed citations
14.
Krohe, Meaghan, et al.. (2016). Patient-reported preferences for oral versus intravenous administration for the treatment of cancer: a review of the literature. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 10. 1609–1621. 180 indexed citations
15.
Reaney, Matthew, et al.. (2015). 1700 ORAL Similarities and differences between symptoms and impacts of ovarian cancer as reported by the patients and their caregivers. European Journal of Cancer. 51. S248–S248. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bergvall, Niklas, Daniel Eek, Anders Gustavsson, et al.. (2010). Relative importance of patient disease indicators on informal care and caregiver burden in Alzheimer's disease. International Psychogeriatrics. 23(1). 73–85. 90 indexed citations
17.
Eek, Daniel & Marcus Selart. (2009). The Choice between Allocation Principles: Amplifying When Equality Dominates. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 1 indexed citations
18.
Rothstein, Bo & Daniel Eek. (2006). Political Corruption and Social Trust: An Experimental Approach. Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University). 38 indexed citations
19.
Eek, Daniel & Tommy Gärling. (2006). Prosocials prefer equal outcomes to maximizing joint outcomes. British Journal of Social Psychology. 45(2). 321–337. 38 indexed citations
20.
Gustafsson, Mathias, Daniel Eek, & Tommy Gärling. (2004). Asymmetrical access to information in social dilemmas with resource uncertainty. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026