Tom Vanwing

793 total citations
36 papers, 548 citations indexed

About

Tom Vanwing is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Vanwing has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 548 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Education, 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Tom Vanwing's work include Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers). Tom Vanwing is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers). Tom Vanwing collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Poland and Cameroon. Tom Vanwing's co-authors include Chang Zhu, Céline Cocquyt, Anh Nguyet Diep, Liesbeth De Donder, Sarah Dury, Dominique Verté, Tine Buffel, Nico De Witte, Wolfgang Jacquet and Danae Maniatis and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers & Education and AMBIO.

In The Last Decade

Tom Vanwing

31 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Vanwing Belgium 13 165 139 88 63 62 36 548
Dickson Adom Ghana 13 146 0.9× 164 1.2× 32 0.4× 12 0.2× 38 0.6× 81 666
Isidro Maya‐Jariego Spain 19 156 0.9× 568 4.1× 102 1.2× 44 0.7× 48 0.8× 120 1.2k
Matthew DeBell United States 13 203 1.2× 207 1.5× 34 0.4× 5 0.1× 10 0.2× 21 561
Jill Zarestky United States 12 222 1.3× 83 0.6× 12 0.1× 32 0.5× 17 0.3× 47 533
Lina Vyas Hong Kong 12 75 0.5× 243 1.7× 68 0.8× 14 0.2× 12 0.2× 45 714
Rodrigo Asún Chile 10 98 0.6× 106 0.8× 20 0.2× 10 0.2× 14 0.2× 42 378
Jessie McLean Australia 15 69 0.4× 192 1.4× 27 0.3× 12 0.2× 15 0.2× 40 551
Juan Sebastián Fernández Prados Spain 13 103 0.6× 161 1.2× 12 0.1× 43 0.7× 10 0.2× 56 584
Catherine Ashcraft United States 15 129 0.8× 176 1.3× 6 0.1× 38 0.6× 10 0.2× 38 534
Afdal Afdal Indonesia 15 394 2.4× 197 1.4× 15 0.2× 4 0.1× 33 0.5× 238 802

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Vanwing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Vanwing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Vanwing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Vanwing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Vanwing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Vanwing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Vanwing. The network helps show where Tom Vanwing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Vanwing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Vanwing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Vanwing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Vanwing. Tom Vanwing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vanwing, Tom, et al.. (2024). What do we know about Indigenous Peoples with low back pain around the world? A topical review. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 24(1).
2.
Kervyn, Matthieu, et al.. (2024). Building a prepared community to volcanic risk in the global south: Assessment of awareness raising tools for high school students in Goma, (East DR Congo). Progress in Disaster Science. 24. 100370–100370. 2 indexed citations
3.
Jacquet, Wolfgang, et al.. (2021). Reducing albinism related stigma in Tanzania: an exploration of the impact of radio drama and radio interview. Disability & Society. 37(9). 1479–1500. 5 indexed citations
4.
Diep, Anh Nguyet, et al.. (2019). Adult learners' needs in online and blended learning. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 28 indexed citations
5.
Cocquyt, Céline, et al.. (2019). Examining the role of learning support in blended learning for adults' social inclusion and social capital. Computers & Education. 142. 103610–103610. 38 indexed citations
6.
Diep, Anh Nguyet, et al.. (2018). Adult learners’ social connectedness and online participation: the importance of online interaction quality. Studies in Continuing Education. 41(3). 326–346. 15 indexed citations
7.
Diep, Anh Nguyet, Céline Cocquyt, Chang Zhu, & Tom Vanwing. (2017). Online interaction quality among adult learners: The role of sense of belonging and perceived learning benefits. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 16(2). 71–78. 6 indexed citations
8.
Cocquyt, Céline, et al.. (2017). Examining social inclusion and social capital among adult learners in blended and online learning environments. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults. 8(1). 77–101. 23 indexed citations
9.
Diep, Anh Nguyet, et al.. (2017). Effects of core self-evaluation and online interaction quality on adults' learning performance and bonding and bridging social capital. The Internet and Higher Education. 34. 41–55. 32 indexed citations
10.
Herdt, Tom De, et al.. (2016). The influence of institutions on access to forest resources in Cameroon: The case of Tofala Hill Wildlife Sanctuary. Journal for Nature Conservation. 34. 42–50. 1 indexed citations
11.
Struyven, Katrien, et al.. (2016). A Holistic Understanding of Integrational Support from University Students’ Perspective Through Appreciative Inquiry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 228. 293–298. 4 indexed citations
12.
Diep, Anh Nguyet, Céline Cocquyt, Chang Zhu, & Tom Vanwing. (2016). Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital. Computers & Education. 101. 84–101. 70 indexed citations
13.
Vanwing, Tom, et al.. (2015). Participation Throughout the Decades: How the Zeitgeist Influences both Theory and Practice – A Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 191. 1713–1717. 4 indexed citations
14.
Brosens, Dorien, Liesbeth De Donder, Sarah Dury, Tom Vanwing, & Dominique Verté. (2015). Life Long Learning: The Prison Library as a Bridge to Participation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 191. 1496–1500. 5 indexed citations
15.
Vanwing, Tom, et al.. (2015). Participatory integrated coastal zone management in Vietnam: Theory versus practice case study: Thua Thien Hue province. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures. 4(1). 42–53. 11 indexed citations
16.
Brosens, Dorien, Liesbeth De Donder, Tom Vanwing, Sarah Dury, & Dominique Verté. (2014). Lifelong Learning Programs in Prison: Influence of Social Networks on Participation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116. 518–523. 10 indexed citations
18.
Buffel, Tine, Dominique Verté, Liesbeth De Donder, et al.. (2011). Theorising the relationship between older people and their immediate social living environment. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 31(1). 13–32. 83 indexed citations
19.
Haq, Shah Md Atiqul, Tom Vanwing, & Luc Hens. (2010). Perception, Environmental Degradation and Family Size Preference: a Context of Developing Countries. Journal of Sustainable Development. 3(4). 13 indexed citations
20.
Vanwing, Tom, et al.. (2002). Vizier op agogiek. 234–262. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026