Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities
2012313 citationsTine Buffel, Chris Phillipson et al.profile →
Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment
This map shows the geographic impact of Tine Buffel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tine Buffel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tine Buffel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tine Buffel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tine Buffel. The network helps show where Tine Buffel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tine Buffel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tine Buffel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tine Buffel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tine Buffel. Tine Buffel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Donder, Liesbeth De, Dominique Verté, Nico De Witte, Tine Buffel, & Sarah Dury. (2010). REFLECTIONS ABOUT INTERVENTIONS AND STRATEGIES ON INCREASING FEELINGS OF SAFETY IN LATER LIFE. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
13.
Verté, Dominique, et al.. (2010). OLDER PEOPLE AND SPORT, LOOKING BEYOND THE HEALTH PERSPECTIVE. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
14.
Witte, Nico De, Tine Buffel, Liesbeth De Donder, & Sarah Dury. (2010). Care shortages in later life: The role of individual and contextual variables in Belgium. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
15.
Buffel, Tine, Dominique Verté, Veerle Vyncke, & Sara Willems. (2009). Netwerken, vertrouwen en wederkerigheid: over de complexiteit van het concept sociaal kapitaal. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
16.
Donder, Liesbeth De, Tine Buffel, Dominique Verté, Sarah Dury, & Nico De Witte. (2009). Feelings of insecurity in context: Theoretical perspectives for studying fear of crime in late life.. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1(1). 1–20.7 indexed citations
17.
Dury, Sarah, Dominique Verté, Liesbeth De Donder, et al.. (2009). Assessing cultural participation in later life:: The impact of socio-demographic variables, physical health and urbanisation. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 439–451.1 indexed citations
18.
Donder, Liesbeth De, Tine Buffel, Dominique Verté, & Nico De Witte. (2009). Fear of crime among the elderly:: A social capital perspective.. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 93–107.3 indexed citations
19.
Buffel, Tine, Dominique Verté, Liesbeth De Donder, et al.. (2009). The social environment as potential expression of human agency: a gerontological perspective. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 423–438.1 indexed citations
20.
Buffel, Tine, et al.. (2008). Exploring the links between conceptions of the neighbourhood and gerontological research perspectives.. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 221–234.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.