Tom Thatcher
- Religious studies top 1%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 17
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 7
- Christian Theology and Mission 1
- Archeology top 10%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 2
-
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 1
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 11
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 2
-
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 2
Tom Thatcher
15 papers receiving 70 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Religious studies 78
- Archeology 25
- Development 8
- Communication 11
- Philosophy 15
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Thatcher
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Thatcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Thatcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Thatcher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Thatcher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Thatcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Thatcher. The network helps show where Tom Thatcher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Tom Thatcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The passion of Jesus and the Gospel of John. Progress and prospects | 2016 | 0 |
| 2 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 3 | The Fourth Gospel in first-century media culture | 2011 | 3 |
| 4 | Luke, John, and the Dead Sea Scrolls | 2011 | 0 |
| 5 | Anatomies of narrative criticism : the past, present, and futures of the Fourth Gospel as literature | 2009 | 7 |
| 6 | Greater than Caesar: Christology and Empire in the Fourth Gospel | 2009 | 6 |
| 7 | What We Have Heard from the Beginning: The Past, Present and Future of Johannine Studies | 2007 | 3 |
| 8 | New currents through John : a global perspective | 2006 | 4 |
| 9 | Jesus the Riddler: The Power of Ambiguity in the Gospels | 2006 | 6 |
| 10 | Memory, tradition, and text: uses of the past in early Christianity | 2005 | 40 |
| 11 | Why John Wrote a Gospel: Jesus--Memory--History | 2005 | 9 |
| 12 | Jesus in Johannine tradition | 2001 | 12 |
| 13 | The Riddles of Jesus in John: A Study in Tradition and Folklore | 2000 | 3 |
| 14 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 18 | Philo on Pilate: Rhetoric or Reality? | 1995 | 1 |
| 19 | The Gospel Genre: What Are We After? | 1994 | 3 |
About Tom Thatcher
Tom Thatcher is a scholar working on Religious studies, Classics, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Archeology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 101 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (17 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (7 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper) and Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (78 citations), Archeology (25 citations), Development (8 citations), Communication (11 citations) and Philosophy (15 citations). Frequent co-authors include Stephen D. Moore, George J. Brooke and Paul N. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Study of Judaism, Biblical Interpretation, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Journal for the Study of the New Testament and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.