Samuel Byrskog
- Religious studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Archeology top 10%
- History top 10%
- Philosophy
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (23 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers)Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Religious studiesArcheologyClassics
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical LiteratureNew Testament StudiesJournal for the Study of the New Testament
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenJapan
In The Last Decade
Samuel Byrskog
18 papers receiving 69 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Religious studies 75
- Sociology and Political Science 51
- Archeology 32
- History 16
- Philosophy 11
Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Byrskog
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Byrskog's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Byrskog with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Byrskog more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Byrskog
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Byrskog. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Byrskog. The network helps show where Samuel Byrskog may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samuel Byrskog
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samuel Byrskog. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samuel Byrskog based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Samuel Byrskog. Samuel Byrskog is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Jesus the Only Teacher: Further Thoughts | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | The making of Christianity : conflicts, contacts, and constructions : essays in honor of Bengt Holmberg | 1 |
| 5 | The Historicity of Jesus. How Do We Know that Jesus Existed | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Jesus in Memory: Traditions in Oral and Scribal Perspectives | 7 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Performing the Past: Gospel Genre and Identity Formation in the Context of Ancient History Writing | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | History or Story in Acts–A Middle Way? The ‘We’ Passages, Historical Intertexture, and Oral History | 3 |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Jesus the Only Teacher: Didactic Authority and Transmission in Ancient Israel, Ancient Judaism and the Matthean Community | 5 |
About Samuel Byrskog
Samuel Byrskog is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 101 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (23 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (75 citations), Archeology (32 citations) and Classics (7 citations). Samuel Byrskog has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Rudolf Bultmann, J.H. Marsh, Christopher R. Matthews, Werner H. Kelber and Magnus Zetterholm. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, New Testament Studies and Journal for the Study of the New Testament.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.