Biblical Interpretation
- Religious studies top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Archeology top 10%
- Development top 10%
- Philosophy
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and InterpretationArchaeology and Historical StudiesHistorical and Linguistic Studies
In The Last Decade
Biblical Interpretation
406 papers receiving 974 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Religious studies 1.0k
- Sociology and Political Science 742
- Archeology 363
- Development 197
- Philosophy 174
Countries where authors publish in Biblical Interpretation
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biblical Interpretation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biblical Interpretation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biblical Interpretation more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Biblical Interpretation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biblical Interpretation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biblical Interpretation.
About Biblical Interpretation
The 612 papers published in Biblical Interpretation in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Biblical Interpretation usually cover Religious studies (482 papers), Development (125 papers) and Archeology (173 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (461 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (159 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biblical Interpretation are Philip F. Esler, Ellen van Wolde, Dale B. Martin, Stephen D. Moore, Timothy Beal, Jennifer A. Glancy, John H. Elliott, Bruce W. Longenecker, Mark D. Nanos and Colleen Conway.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.