Journal for the Study of Judaism

785 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 785 papers published in Journal for the Study of Judaism in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal for the Study of Judaism usually cover Religious studies (593 papers), Archeology (532 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (351 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (588 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (472 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (298 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal for the Study of Judaism are James Nati, Steve Mason, Katell Berthelot, Gideon Bohak, Eyal Regev, Hindy Najman, Matthew Goff, Anders Klostergaard Petersen, A.S. van der Woude and Richard A. Horsley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal for the Study of Judaism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal for the Study of Judaism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal for the Study of Judaism.

Countries where authors publish in Journal for the Study of Judaism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal for the Study of Judaism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal for the Study of Judaism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal for the Study of Judaism more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025