Tom Quested

3.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
27 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Tom Quested is a scholar working on Food Science, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Quested has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Food Science, 10 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and 7 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Tom Quested's work include Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (21 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (10 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (7 papers). Tom Quested is often cited by papers focused on Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (21 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (10 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (7 papers). Tom Quested collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Tom Quested's co-authors include Andrew D. Parry, Eliza Marsh, Åsa Stenmarck, Carl Jensen, G. K. Moates, Richard Swannell, Christian Reynolds, Erica van Herpen, Nancy Holthuysen and I.A. van der Lans and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Cleaner Production and Waste Management.

In The Last Decade

Tom Quested

26 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 2016 2019 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Quested United Kingdom 16 2.2k 1.1k 676 498 444 27 2.5k
Hanna Hartikainen Finland 14 1.5k 0.7× 774 0.7× 440 0.7× 435 0.9× 313 0.7× 21 1.9k
Matteo Vittuari Italy 27 1.4k 0.6× 744 0.7× 436 0.6× 351 0.7× 298 0.7× 81 2.1k
Ludovica Principato Italy 22 1.8k 0.8× 834 0.8× 413 0.6× 768 1.5× 365 0.8× 39 2.4k
Julian Parfitt United Kingdom 10 2.0k 0.9× 908 0.8× 705 1.0× 322 0.6× 319 0.7× 12 2.9k
Juha‐Matti Katajajuuri Finland 17 1.3k 0.6× 695 0.6× 404 0.6× 575 1.2× 270 0.6× 68 2.1k
Mattias Eriksson Sweden 29 1.8k 0.8× 890 0.8× 460 0.7× 300 0.6× 429 1.0× 75 2.6k
David Pearson Australia 26 1.3k 0.6× 345 0.3× 1.2k 1.8× 861 1.7× 273 0.6× 110 2.8k
Christian Reynolds United Kingdom 27 1.1k 0.5× 520 0.5× 353 0.5× 177 0.4× 434 1.0× 109 2.2k
Karin Dobernig Austria 8 964 0.4× 401 0.4× 289 0.4× 287 0.6× 188 0.4× 8 1.3k
Karin Schanes Austria 9 960 0.4× 424 0.4× 240 0.4× 394 0.8× 157 0.4× 11 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Quested

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Quested's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Quested with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Quested more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Quested

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Quested. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Quested. The network helps show where Tom Quested may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Quested

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Quested. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Quested based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Quested. Tom Quested is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Quested, Tom, et al.. (2025). Modelling the impact of shelf-life extension on fresh produce waste in UK homes. Cleaner Waste Systems. 10. 100210–100210.
2.
Papargyropoulou, Effie, Guy M. Poppy, Tom Quested, et al.. (2025). Research framework for food security and sustainability. npj Science of Food. 9(1). 13–13. 4 indexed citations
3.
Guo, Rui, Christian Reynolds, D. Rees, et al.. (2024). Assessing the environmental sustainability of consumer-centric poultry chain in the UK through life cycle approaches and the household simulation model. The Science of The Total Environment. 929. 172634–172634. 3 indexed citations
4.
Herpen, Erica van, et al.. (2023). Convenient tools and social norms: Measuring the effectiveness of an intervention to reduce household food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production. 429. 139604–139604. 17 indexed citations
5.
Unsworth, Kerrie, et al.. (2023). Food waste interventions: Experimental evidence of the effectiveness of environmental messages. Journal of Cleaner Production. 414. 137596–137596. 15 indexed citations
6.
Unsworth, Kerrie, et al.. (2022). Don't put all your eggs in one basket: Testing an integrative model of household food waste. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 185. 106442–106442. 27 indexed citations
7.
Quested, Tom, et al.. (2020). Comparing diaries and waste compositional analysis for measuring food waste in the home. Journal of Cleaner Production. 262. 121263–121263. 86 indexed citations
8.
Reynolds, Christian, et al.. (2020). Using discrete event simulation to explore food wasted in the home. Journal of Simulation. 16(4). 415–435. 15 indexed citations
9.
Reynolds, Christian, Tom Quested, Sarah Bromley, et al.. (2019). Review: Consumption-Stage Food Waste Reduction Interventions – What Works and How to Do Better. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
10.
Reynolds, Christian, Tom Quested, Sarah Bromley, et al.. (2019). Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions. Food Policy. 83. 7–27. 330 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Herpen, Erica van, et al.. (2019). A validated survey to measure household food waste. MethodsX. 6. 2767–2775. 64 indexed citations
12.
Herpen, Erica van, I.A. van der Lans, Nancy Holthuysen, Mariska Nijenhuis‐de Vries, & Tom Quested. (2019). Comparing wasted apples and oranges: An assessment of methods to measure household food waste. Waste Management. 88. 71–84. 122 indexed citations
13.
Spang, Edward S., Sara A. Pace, Yigal Achmon, et al.. (2019). Food Loss and Waste: Measurement, Drivers, and Solutions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 44(1). 117–156. 145 indexed citations
14.
Swannell, Richard, et al.. (2019). The Food Waste Atlas: An important tool to track food loss and waste and support the creation of a sustainable global food system. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 146. 534–535. 5 indexed citations
15.
Cooper, Karen, et al.. (2018). Nutrition in the Bin: A Nutritional and Environmental Assessment of Food Wasted in the UK. Frontiers in Nutrition. 5. 19–19. 40 indexed citations
16.
Östergren, Karin, et al.. (2016). Food waste quantification manual to monitor food waste amounts and progression. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 56 indexed citations
17.
Freeman, Rachel, et al.. (2013). Evidence building for waste prevention: understanding the causal influences that result in waste. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
18.
Quested, Tom, et al.. (2013). Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 79. 43–51. 662 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Freeman, Rachel, et al.. (2013). The 31st International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Cambridge, Massachusetts USA. 3 indexed citations
20.
Quested, Tom, P.E. Cook, L.G.M. Gorris, & Martin Cole. (2010). Trends in technology, trade and consumption likely to impact on microbial food safety. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 139. S29–S42. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026