Waste Management

9.4k papers and 441.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.4k papers published in Waste Management in the last decades have received a total of 441.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Waste Management usually cover Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (4.7k papers), Building and Construction (2.5k papers) and Biomedical Engineering (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (2.2k papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (2.1k papers) and Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production (929 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Waste Management are Umberto Arena, Thomas H. Christensen, Thomas Fruergaard Astrup, Anders Lagerkvist, Kim Ragaert, Paul T. Williams, Charlotte Scheutz, Kevin M. Van Geem, Raffaello Cossu and Paola Lettieri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Waste Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Waste Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Waste Management.

Countries where authors publish in Waste Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Waste Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Waste Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Waste Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025