Tom Lahti

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Tom Lahti is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Lahti has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 9 papers in Accounting and 5 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Tom Lahti's work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (12 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (9 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers). Tom Lahti is often cited by papers focused on Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (12 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (9 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers). Tom Lahti collaborates with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and Switzerland. Tom Lahti's co-authors include Joakim Wincent, Vinit Parida, Thommie Burström, Marja‐Liisa Halko, Necmi Karagozoglu, Joakim Wincent, Jeaneth Johansson, Malin Malmström, Kaisa Hytönen and April J. Spivack and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Business Venturing and Human Brain Mapping.

In The Last Decade

Tom Lahti

19 papers receiving 997 citations

Hit Papers

AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation i... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Lahti Finland 13 453 448 208 206 183 19 1.0k
Ksenia Podoynitsyna Netherlands 15 674 1.5× 612 1.4× 240 1.2× 253 1.2× 199 1.1× 28 1.4k
Rui Torres de Oliveira Australia 19 632 1.4× 191 0.4× 144 0.7× 234 1.1× 123 0.7× 53 1.2k
Moreno Muffatto Italy 21 407 0.9× 981 2.2× 155 0.7× 175 0.8× 293 1.6× 52 1.5k
Giovanna Magnani Italy 12 718 1.6× 254 0.6× 101 0.5× 185 0.9× 155 0.8× 31 1.2k
Peter M. Bican Germany 13 427 0.9× 345 0.8× 98 0.5× 154 0.7× 94 0.5× 32 1.0k
Frida Lind Sweden 17 530 1.2× 314 0.7× 100 0.5× 173 0.8× 75 0.4× 40 873
Laura Broccardo Italy 15 420 0.9× 203 0.5× 141 0.7× 289 1.4× 58 0.3× 73 1.0k
Helena Sjögrén Finland 11 375 0.8× 280 0.6× 84 0.4× 216 1.0× 158 0.9× 28 759
Elena Candelo Italy 14 528 1.2× 261 0.6× 97 0.5× 369 1.8× 154 0.8× 30 1.3k
Fernando G. Alberti Italy 17 424 0.9× 395 0.9× 109 0.5× 127 0.6× 142 0.8× 39 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Lahti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Lahti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Lahti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Lahti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Lahti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Lahti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Lahti. The network helps show where Tom Lahti may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Lahti

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Lahti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Lahti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Lahti. Tom Lahti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Spivack, April J., Tom Lahti, Thommie Burström, & Joakim Wincent. (2025). Legitimacy perceptions amid institutional pluralism: How hype over decoupled practices influences entrepreneurial ventures. Journal of Business Venturing. 40(4). 106505–106505. 5 indexed citations
2.
Burström, Thommie, Tom Lahti, Vinit Parida, & Joakim Wincent. (2024). Industrial ecosystems: A systematic review, framework and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 208. 123656–123656. 8 indexed citations
3.
Burström, Thommie, et al.. (2023). A definition, review, and extension of global ecosystems theory: Trends, architecture and orchestration of global VCs and mechanisms behind unicorns. Journal of Business Research. 157. 113605–113605. 10 indexed citations
4.
Burström, Thommie, et al.. (2022). Software Ecosystems Now and in the Future: A Definition, Systematic Literature Review, and Integration Into the Business and Digital Ecosystem Literature. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 71. 12243–12258. 12 indexed citations
5.
Burström, Thommie, Vinit Parida, Tom Lahti, & Joakim Wincent. (2021). AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research. Journal of Business Research. 127. 85–95. 216 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Johansson, Jeaneth, Malin Malmström, Tom Lahti, & Joakim Wincent. (2020). Oh, it’s complex to see women here, isn’t it and this seems to take all my attention! A repertory grid approach to capture venture capitalists cognitive structures when evaluating women entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. 15. e00218–e00218. 13 indexed citations
7.
Lahti, Tom, Marja‐Liisa Halko, Necmi Karagozoglu, & Joakim Wincent. (2018). Why and how do founding entrepreneurs bond with their ventures? Neural correlates of entrepreneurial and parental bonding. Journal of Business Venturing. 34(2). 368–388. 40 indexed citations
8.
Lahti, Tom, et al.. (2018). The role of inspiration in entrepreneurship: Theory and the future research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 101. 548–554. 37 indexed citations
9.
10.
Halko, Marja‐Liisa, et al.. (2017). Entrepreneurial and parental love—are they the same?. Human Brain Mapping. 38(6). 2923–2938. 10 indexed citations
11.
Parida, Vinit, Tom Lahti, & Joakim Wincent. (2016). Exploration and exploitation and firm performance variability: a study of ambidexterity in entrepreneurial firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 12(4). 1147–1164. 80 indexed citations
12.
Lahti, Tom, et al.. (2016). Business angel networks: a review and assessment of their value to entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. 13 indexed citations
13.
Lahti, Tom, et al.. (2016). Does startup experience matter? Venture capital selection criteria among Israeli entrepreneurs. Venture Capital. 18(2). 149–174. 19 indexed citations
14.
Parida, Vinit, et al.. (2016). Influence of subjective interpretation, causation, and effectuation on initial venture sale. Journal of Business Research. 69(11). 4815–4819. 24 indexed citations
15.
Parida, Vinit, et al.. (2014). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 12(2). 309–350. 250 indexed citations
16.
Lahti, Tom. (2012). The value-added contribution of advisors in the process of acquiring venture capital. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship. 32(3). 307–326. 19 indexed citations
17.
Lahti, Tom. (2011). Categorization of angel investments: an explorative analysis of risk reduction strategies in Finland. Venture Capital. 13(1). 49–74. 30 indexed citations
18.
Lahti, Tom. (2011). Angel investing: an examination of the evolution of the Finnish market. Venture Capital. 13(2). 147–173. 14 indexed citations
19.
Lahti, Tom, et al.. (2009). The role of advisors in the venture capital investment process. Venture Capital. 11(3). 229–254. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026