Tom Cassidy

34 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Tom Cassidy
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Museology 52
  • Architecture 20
  • Polymers and Plastics 129
  • Marketing 73
  • Human-Computer Interaction 30
Replace Masayuki Takatera with:
Masayuki Takatera Japan
Karen LaBat United States
Youngjoo Na South Korea
Carole Bouchard France
Trevor J. Little United States
Jari Laru Finland
Cynthia L. Istook United States
Edwin Kamalha China
Phoebe Apeagyei United Kingdom
Simeon Gill United Kingdom
Tom Cassidy relative to Masayuki Takatera Japan Masayuki Takatera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Masayuki Takatera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Cassidy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Cassidy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Cassidy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Cassidy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Cassidy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Cassidy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Cassidy. The network helps show where Tom Cassidy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Cassidy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Cassidy Line = papers co-authored together Tom Cassidy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201992
2 200654
3 201047
4 199735
5 199734
6 199727
7 199114
8 200310
9 19979
10 20179
11 20028
12 20028
13 20177
14 20117
15 20156
16 20086
17 19896
18 20155
19 20015
20 20173

About Tom Cassidy

Tom Cassidy is a scholar working on Polymers and Plastics, Museology, Mechanics of Materials, Computational Mechanics and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 415 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Textile materials and evaluations (16 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (7 papers), Mechanical Behavior of Composites (6 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (5 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (4 papers), Structural Analysis and Optimization (3 papers), Optical Coatings and Gratings (3 papers) and Design Education and Practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (52 citations), Architecture (20 citations), Polymers and Plastics (129 citations), Marketing (73 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations). Tom Cassidy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Stones, Eunsuk Hur, S. A. Grishanov, R. J. Harwood, Stepan Vladimirovitch Lomov, Daniel Poitras, J. A. Dobrowolski, S. Moisa, François Siewe and C. T. McElroy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Textile Institute, International Journal of Fashion Design Technology and Education, Design Studies, Textile Research Journal and International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact