This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Burns more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Burns. The network helps show where Tom Burns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Burns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Burns.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Burns based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Burns. Tom Burns is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burns, Tom & Nina Witoszek. (2012). Sustainability : A Humanistic Agenda. Journal of Human Ecology. 39(2). 155–170.
2.
Burns, Tom & Christian Stöhr. (2011). Power, Knowledge, and Conflict in the Shaping of Commons Governance. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Burns, Tom, Jorun Rugkåsa, John Dawson, et al.. (2010). 10PRT/0496: Oxford Community Treatment Order Evaluation Trial (OCTET): a single-outcome randomised controlled trial of compulsory outpatient treatment in psychosis (ISRCTN73110773). ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 87(1). 41–3.4 indexed citations
5.
Carson, Marcus, et al.. (2009). Paradigms in public policy : theory and practice of paradigm shifts in the EU. P. Lang eBooks.28 indexed citations
6.
Burns, Tom & Ewa Roszkowska. (2008). THE SOCIAL THEORY OF CHOICE: FROM SIMON AND KAHNEMAN-TVERSKY TO GGT MODELLING OF SOCIALLY CONTEXTUALIZED DECISION SITUATIONS. 3(39). 3–44.9 indexed citations
7.
Burns, Tom, et al.. (2006). Teorias dos sistemas dinâmicos: Teorizações sobre o capitalismo e a sua evolução. Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT).1 indexed citations
8.
Burns, Tom, et al.. (2006). Teorizações sobre o capitalismo e a sua evolução : Teorias dos sistemas dinâmicos.1 indexed citations
9.
Burns, Tom & Ewa Roszkowska. (2005). GENERALIZED GAME THEORY: ASSUMPTIONS, PRINCIPLES, AND ELABORATIONS GROUNDED IN SOCIAL THEORY. Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric. 8(21).9 indexed citations
10.
Burns, Tom, et al.. (2003). The Three Faces of the Coin : A Socio-economic Approach to the Institution of Money. SSRN Electronic Journal. 16(2). 149–195.4 indexed citations
Kendrick, Tony, Tom Burns, C J Garland, Nan Greenwood, & Philip Smith. (2000). Are specialist mental health services being targeted on the most needy patients? The effects of setting up special services in general practice.. PubMed. 50(451). 121–6.34 indexed citations
13.
Kendrick, Tony, et al.. (1998). Practice nurse involvement in giving depot neuroleptic injections: Development of a patient assessment and monitoring checklist. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).4 indexed citations
14.
Burns, Tom, et al.. (1998). The social construction of consciousness. Part 1: collective consciousness and its socio-cultural foundations. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 5(1). 67–85.26 indexed citations
15.
Burns, Tom, et al.. (1998). The Social Construction of Consciousness : Individual Selves, Self-Awareness, and Reflectivity. Part 2. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 5(2). 166–184.19 indexed citations
Luhmann, Niklas, et al.. (1979). Trust and power : two works.256 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.