Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
K+ is an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in rat arteries
1998892 citationsKim A. Dora, C J Garland et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of C J Garland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C J Garland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C J Garland more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C J Garland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C J Garland. The network helps show where C J Garland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C J Garland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C J Garland.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C J Garland based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C J Garland. C J Garland is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dora, Kim A., et al.. (2004). Role of endothelial cell K+ channels in spreading dilatation. The FASEB Journal. 18.1 indexed citations
10.
Dora, Kim A., et al.. (2004). Selective block of intracellular calcium release and EDHF dilatation in rat isolated resistance arteries. The Journal of Physiology.1 indexed citations
11.
Dora, Kim A., et al.. (2004). A technique to incorporate cell impermeant compounds into the endothelium of pressurized mesenteric arteries. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2.1 indexed citations
12.
Garland, C J, et al.. (2003). Inhibition of endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization in the rat isolated mesenteric artery with the thromboxane mimetic, U46619. The Journal of Physiology.1 indexed citations
13.
Dora, Kim A., et al.. (2002). 1-Ethyl-2-benzimidazolinone activates endothelial cell IKCa and smooth muscle hyperpolarization in rat isolated mesenteric artery. British Journal of Pharmacology. 135.6 indexed citations
14.
Dora, Kim A., et al.. (2002). Modulation of responses to exogenous potassium by potassium channel activity in the rat isolated mesenteric artery. British Journal of Pharmacology. 135.1 indexed citations
15.
Hinton, J.M., et al.. (2000). Potassium currents in endothelial and smooth muscle cells freshly isolated from rat small mesenteric arteries. The Journal of Physiology. 523.1 indexed citations
16.
Kendrick, Tony, Tom Burns, C J Garland, Nan Greenwood, & Philip Smith. (2000). Are specialist mental health services being targeted on the most needy patients? The effects of setting up special services in general practice.. PubMed. 50(451). 121–6.34 indexed citations
17.
Dora, Kim A. & C J Garland. (2000). A crucial influence of precontraction on potassium-induced relaxation in the rat isolated mesenteric artery. British Journal of Pharmacology. 131.1 indexed citations
Scott, Angela, C J Garland, & G Gillespie. (1977). Peptic ulceration of the left atrium.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 22(5). 331–2.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.