Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Conrad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Conrad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Conrad more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Conrad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Conrad. The network helps show where Peter Conrad may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Conrad
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Conrad.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Conrad based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Conrad. Peter Conrad is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bergey, Meredith, Ângela Marques Filipe, Peter Conrad, & Ilina Singh. (2018). Global Perspectives on ADHD: Social Dimensions of Diagnosis and Treatment in Sixteen Countries. LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine).40 indexed citations
2.
Conrad, Peter. (2013). Der Grundsatz der beiderseitigen Strafbarkeit im Rechtshilfe- und Strafanwendungsrecht.
3.
Conrad, Peter. (2012). Free agent: Anna Funder finds her feet in Brooklyn. 36.1 indexed citations
4.
Conrad, Peter. (2011). An auteur planet [Film reviews of The Skin I Live In by Almodovar, Pedro; and Melancholia by von Trier, Lars.]. 78.1 indexed citations
5.
Jutel, Annemarie & Peter Conrad. (2011). Putting a Name to It: Diagnosis in Contemporary Society. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).117 indexed citations
6.
Conrad, Peter. (2010). Lest we forget [Book review of Lunn, Hugh. Words Fail Me: A Journey through Australia's Lost Language (2010).]. 56.1 indexed citations
7.
Conrad, Peter. (2009). Coming of Age: Peter Conrad on Robin Boyd's 'The Australian Ugliness' Fifty Years On [Book Review]. 60.1 indexed citations
Conrad, Peter. (2007). Eliot Freidson's revolution in medical sociology. Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine. 11(2). 141–144.8 indexed citations
10.
Conrad, Peter. (2005). The sociology of health & illness:critical perspectives.14 indexed citations
Bird, Chloe E., Peter Conrad, & Allen Fremont. (2000). Medical Sociology at the Millennium.9 indexed citations
15.
Conrad, Peter & Jonathan Gabe. (1999). Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast).67 indexed citations
Conrad, Peter, Joseph W. Schneider, & Joseph R. Gusfield. (1992). Deviance and medicalization : from badness to sickness : with a new afterword by the authors. Temple University Press eBooks.13 indexed citations
18.
Conrad, Peter. (1987). The experience of illness. Social Science & Medicine. 24(8). 700–701.20 indexed citations
19.
Conrad, Peter. (1984). The art of the city : views and versions of New York. Oxford University Press eBooks.11 indexed citations
20.
Conrad, Peter & Shulamit Reinharz. (1984). Computers and qualitative data.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.