Cees Jonker
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.2%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 44
- Co-authors
- Ben SchmandMirjam I. GeerlingsHannie C. ComijsJ. LindeboomPhilip ScheltensChris HooijerMiranda G. DikRose‐Marie Dröes
- Journals
- Neurobiology of Aging (11 papers)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (10 papers)International Psychogeriatrics (6 papers)Nuclear Physics A (6 papers)Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Cees Jonker
115 papers receiving 6.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 353
- Psychiatry and Mental health 3.2k
- Neurology 705
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 322
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Cees Jonker
This map shows the geographic impact of Cees Jonker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cees Jonker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cees Jonker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cees Jonker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cees Jonker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cees Jonker. The network helps show where Cees Jonker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cees Jonker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 130 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 62 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 79 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 65 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 145 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 176 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 77 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 14 | Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A review of clinical and population-based studies Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 710 |
| 15 | 1999 | 240 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 404 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 96 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 288 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 352 |
About Cees Jonker
Cees Jonker is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiation, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Neurology, having authored 118 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (44 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (13 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (353 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (3.2k citations), Neurology (705 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (322 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations). Cees Jonker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ben Schmand, Mirjam I. Geerlings, Hannie C. Comijs, J. Lindeboom, Philip Scheltens, Chris Hooijer, Miranda G. Dik, Rose‐Marie Dröes, L.M. Bouter and D.J.H. Deeg. Their work appears in journals such as Neurobiology of Aging, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, International Psychogeriatrics, Nuclear Physics A and Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.