Todd W. Hall
- Health top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Demography top 2%
- Co-authors
- Keith J. EdwardsBenjamin R. KarneyJoanne DavilaThomas N. BradburyBeth Fletcher BrokawPeter C. HillM. Elizabeth Lewis HallHarold D. Delaney
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (32 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (12 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Todd W. Hall
45 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Health 964
- Social Psychology 678
- Clinical Psychology 617
- Sociology and Political Science 452
- Demography 206
Countries citing papers authored by Todd W. Hall
This map shows the geographic impact of Todd W. Hall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd W. Hall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd W. Hall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Todd W. Hall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd W. Hall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd W. Hall. The network helps show where Todd W. Hall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Todd W. Hall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Todd W. Hall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Todd W. Hall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Todd W. Hall. Todd W. Hall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | The Development of the Spiritual Narrative Questionnaire | 2 |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Predictors of Missionary Job Success: A Review of the Literature and Research Proposal | 6 |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 76 | |
| 15 | Attachment Psychotherapy and God Image | 5 |
| 16 | 248 | |
| 17 | Relational schemas in processing one's image of God and self. | 21 |
| 18 | 51 | |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | 138 |
About Todd W. Hall
Todd W. Hall is a scholar working on Health, Theoretical Computer Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (32 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (12 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (964 citations), Social Psychology (678 citations) and Clinical Psychology (617 citations). Todd W. Hall has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Keith J. Edwards, Benjamin R. Karney, Joanne Davila, Thomas N. Bradbury, Beth Fletcher Brokaw, Peter C. Hill, M. Elizabeth Lewis Hall, Harold D. Delaney, David Wang and Kenneth I. Pargäment. Their work appears in journals such as Biometrics, Monthly Weather Review and Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.