Thomas N. Bradbury
- Social Psychology top 0.01%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.1%
- Demography top 0.01%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.1%
- Health top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- Benjamin R. KarneyFrank D. FinchamJoanne DavilaLauri A. PaschSteven R. H. BeachGuy BodenmannJustin A. LavnerCatherine L. Cohan
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (158 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (100 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (63 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPsychological BulletinSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas N. Bradbury
188 papers receiving 14.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Social Psychology 12.5k
- Clinical Psychology 6.3k
- Demography 6.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 5.4k
- Health 2.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas N. Bradbury
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas N. Bradbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas N. Bradbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas N. Bradbury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas N. Bradbury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas N. Bradbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas N. Bradbury. The network helps show where Thomas N. Bradbury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas N. Bradbury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas N. Bradbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas N. Bradbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas N. Bradbury. Thomas N. Bradbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 103 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 80 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 197 | |
| 14 | 323 | |
| 15 | 83 | |
| 16 | 248 | |
| 17 | Scheidungsursachen und -verlauf aus der Sicht der Geschiedenen | 6 |
| 18 | 415 | |
| 19 | 225 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About Thomas N. Bradbury
Thomas N. Bradbury is a scholar working on Demography, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 196 papers that have together received 15.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (158 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (100 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (63 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (12.5k citations), Demography (6.2k citations) and Clinical Psychology (6.3k citations). Thomas N. Bradbury has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin R. Karney, Frank D. Fincham, Joanne Davila, Lauri A. Pasch, Steven R. H. Beach, Guy Bodenmann, Justin A. Lavner, Catherine L. Cohan, Erika Lawrence and Ronald D. Rogge. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.