Todd Penner
- Religious studies top 1%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 13
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 2
- Christian Theology and Mission 1
- Development top 10%
- Archeology top 5%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 2
- History top 10%
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 4
-
- Religious Education and Schools 2
-
- Jewish Identity and Society 2
-
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 1
- Journals
- Teaching Theology & Religion (2 papers)Journal of Biblical Literature (1 paper)Journal of the American Academy of Religion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Todd Penner
14 papers receiving 62 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Religious studies 87
- Development 15
- Archeology 39
- History 16
- Sociology and Political Science 60
Countries citing papers authored by Todd Penner
This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Penner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Penner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Penner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Todd Penner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Penner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Penner. The network helps show where Todd Penner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Todd Penner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 3 | De-Introducing the New Testament: Texts, Worlds, Methods, Stories | 2015 | 2 |
| 4 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 7 | Engaging Early Christian History: Reading Acts in the Second Century | 2013 | 4 |
| 8 | Reading Acts in the second century: reflections on method, history, and desire | 2013 | 1 |
| 9 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 14 | In Praise of Christian Origins: Stephen and the Hellenists in Lukan Apologetic Historiography | 2004 | 15 |
| 15 | Contextualizing Acts: Lukan Narrative and Greco-Roman Discourse | 2003 | 24 |
| 16 | The Epistle of James in current research | 1999 | 2 |
| 17 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 18 | The epistle of James and eschatology : re-reading an ancient Christian letter | 1996 | 11 |
About Todd Penner
Todd Penner is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Classics, Development and Philosophy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 100 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (4 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper) and Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (87 citations), Development (15 citations), Archeology (39 citations), History (16 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (60 citations). Todd Penner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eugene V. Gallagher, Martin Klein and William E. Arnal. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching Theology & Religion, Journal of Biblical Literature, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Biblical Interpretation and UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.