Tim Theeboom

887 total citations
9 papers, 489 citations indexed

About

Tim Theeboom is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tim Theeboom has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 489 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Applied Psychology, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tim Theeboom's work include Coaching Methods and Impact (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). Tim Theeboom is often cited by papers focused on Coaching Methods and Impact (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). Tim Theeboom collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Tim Theeboom's co-authors include A.E.M. van Vianen, Bianca Beersma, Jessie Koen, Matthijs de Hoog, Anne P.J. de Pagter and Robert Zwitser and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, BMJ Open and The Journal of Positive Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Tim Theeboom

9 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tim Theeboom Netherlands	5	285	236	180	86	84	9	489
Oranit B. Davidson Israel	6	153 0.5×	134 0.6×	117 0.7×	82 1.0×	86 1.0×	7	401
Megan A. Thoen United States	7	170 0.6×	86 0.4×	142 0.8×	23 0.3×	35 0.4×	7	341
Niño José Mateo Philippines	11	224 0.8×	67 0.3×	160 0.9×	19 0.2×	40 0.5×	26	378
Ernesto Lodi Italy	11	257 0.9×	115 0.5×	157 0.9×	38 0.4×	44 0.5×	20	473
Patrícia Nunes da Fonsêca Brazil	9	238 0.8×	61 0.3×	166 0.9×	48 0.6×	65 0.8×	70	441
M. Pilar Berrios Martos Spain	8	306 1.1×	44 0.2×	136 0.8×	69 0.8×	95 1.1×	14	454
Dee Bartrum Australia	7	242 0.8×	118 0.5×	105 0.6×	51 0.6×	67 0.8×	9	465
Zane Asher Green Pakistan	15	257 0.9×	94 0.4×	284 1.6×	21 0.2×	53 0.6×	23	478
John K. Coffey United States	10	279 1.0×	76 0.3×	195 1.1×	12 0.1×	36 0.4×	19	391
Anna Parola Italy	13	205 0.7×	58 0.2×	225 1.3×	23 0.3×	65 0.8×	44	497

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Theeboom

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Theeboom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Theeboom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Theeboom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Theeboom

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Theeboom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Theeboom. The network helps show where Tim Theeboom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Theeboom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Theeboom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Theeboom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Theeboom. Tim Theeboom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Koen, Jessie, A.E.M. van Vianen, Tim Theeboom, et al.. (2022). Simply effective? The differential effects of solution-focused and problem-focused coaching questions in a self-coaching writing exercise. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 895439–895439. 4 indexed citations

Vianen, A.E.M. van, et al.. (2021). Turning the tide: a quasi-experimental study on a coaching intervention to reduce burn-out symptoms and foster personal resources among medical residents and specialists in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 11(1). e041708–e041708. 17 indexed citations

Vianen, A.E.M. van, et al.. (2019). Keep the fire burning: a survey study on the role of personal resources for work engagement and burnout in medical residents and specialists in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 9(11). e031053–e031053. 23 indexed citations

Theeboom, Tim, A.E.M. van Vianen, & Bianca Beersma. (2017). A Temporal Map of Coaching. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 1352–1352. 14 indexed citations

Theeboom, Tim, et al.. (2017). A practitioner’s perspective on coaching effectiveness. VU Research Portal. 61–77. 1 indexed citations

Theeboom, Tim. (2016). Workplace coaching: Processes and effects. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1 indexed citations

Theeboom, Tim, Bianca Beersma, & A.E.M. van Vianen. (2015). The differential effects of solution-focused and problem-focused coaching questions on the affect, attentional control and cognitive flexibility of undergraduate students experiencing study-related stress. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 11(5). 460–469. 26 indexed citations

Theeboom, Tim, Bianca Beersma, & A.E.M. van Vianen. (2013). Coaching in Organizations – A Meta-Analytic Review of Individual Level Effects. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2013(1). 11881–11881. 3 indexed citations

Theeboom, Tim, Bianca Beersma, & A.E.M. van Vianen. (2013). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 9(1). 1–18. 400 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact