Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement
2008914 citationsTim Coltman, Timothy M. Devinney et al.Journal of Business Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Coltman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Coltman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Coltman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Coltman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Coltman. The network helps show where Tim Coltman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Coltman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Coltman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Coltman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Coltman. Tim Coltman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Anand, Abhijith, Rajeev Sharma, & Tim Coltman. (2016). Four steps to realizing business value from digital data streams. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 15(4). 259.24 indexed citations
4.
Anand, Abhijith, Rajeev Sharma, & Tim Coltman. (2016). Realizing value from business analytics platforms: The effects of managerial search and agility of resource allocation processes. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1.6 indexed citations
Dolničar, Sara, Tim Coltman, & Rajeev Sharma. (2015). Do satisfied tourists really intend to come back? Three concerns with empirical studies linking satisfaction to behavioral intentions. Journal of Travel Research. 54(2).6 indexed citations
Queiroz, Magno & Tim Coltman. (2014). Reorienting the information systems function to support increasing levels of business service. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1.2 indexed citations
11.
Keating, Byron, et al.. (2009). Unpacking the ERP Investment Decision: An Empirical Assessment of the Benefits and Risks. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 2822–2833.3 indexed citations
12.
Coltman, Tim, Timothy M. Devinney, David F. Midgley, & Sunil Venaik. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research. 61(12). 1250–1262.914 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Coltman, Tim, Timothy M. Devinney, & David F. Midgley. (2008). The Value of Managerial Beliefs in Turbulent Environments: Managerial Orientation and E-Business Advantage. Research Online (University of Wollongong).1 indexed citations
Coltman, Tim, et al.. (2007). Economic gardening in Australia: measuring attitude to growth. Research Online (University of Wollongong).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.