Thomas William Heyck
-
- History of Science and Natural History 1
- History top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Anthropological Studies and Insights 2
- Museology top 10%
-
- Irish and British Studies 7
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 2
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 1
-
- Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment 1
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 1
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 1
- Co-authors
- William I. ThomasBruce L. KinzerWilliam R. KleckaPatrick O’MahonyGerard DelantyJohn RoddenDonald Harman AkensonStanford Lehmberg
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (10 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)History of European Ideas (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippines
In The Last Decade
Thomas William Heyck
26 papers receiving 170 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- History and Philosophy of Science 46
- History 70
- Anthropology 32
- General Psychology 4
- Museology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas William Heyck
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas William Heyck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas William Heyck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas William Heyck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas William Heyck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas William Heyck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas William Heyck. The network helps show where Thomas William Heyck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Thomas William Heyck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 34 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 13 | The Peoples of the British Isles: A New History | 1991 | 2 |
| 14 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 92 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1972 | 1 |
About Thomas William Heyck
Thomas William Heyck is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Music and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (1 paper), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (46 citations), History (70 citations) and Anthropology (32 citations). Thomas William Heyck has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include William I. Thomas, Bruce L. Kinzer, William R. Klecka, Patrick O’Mahony, Gerard Delanty, John Rodden, Donald Harman Akenson, Stanford Lehmberg, Regenia Gagnier and George W. Stocking. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and History of European Ideas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.