Thomas N. Darling
- Physiology top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Rheumatology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Joel MossKim B. YanceyKim M. Keppler‐NoreuilLeslie G. BieseckerJ.J. BlumGustavo Pacheco–RodriguezJianwu WangVictoria Parker
- Topics
- Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (41 papers)Tumors and Oncological Cases (15 papers)Skin and Cellular Biology Research (12 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Clinical Investigation
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaJapan
In The Last Decade
Thomas N. Darling
104 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Physiology 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 907
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 732
- Oncology 601
- Rheumatology 580
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas N. Darling
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas N. Darling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas N. Darling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas N. Darling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas N. Darling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas N. Darling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas N. Darling. The network helps show where Thomas N. Darling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas N. Darling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas N. Darling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas N. Darling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas N. Darling. Thomas N. Darling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 183 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 134 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About Thomas N. Darling
Thomas N. Darling is a scholar working on Physiology, Dermatology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 108 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (41 papers), Tumors and Oncological Cases (15 papers) and Skin and Cellular Biology Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (732 citations) and Rheumatology (580 citations). Thomas N. Darling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Joel Moss, Kim B. Yancey, Kim M. Keppler‐Noreuil, Leslie G. Biesecker, J.J. Blum, Gustavo Pacheco–Rodriguez, Jianwu Wang, Victoria Parker, Julián A. Martínez-Agosto and Zelmira Lazarova. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.