Thomas Michael Power

18 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Thomas Michael Power
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Global and Planetary Change 172
  • Economics and Econometrics 168
  • Sociology and Political Science 109
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 108
  • Education 51
Replace Diane C. Bates with:
Diane C. Bates United States
Sara Singleton United States
Daniel A. DeCaro United States
Susan J. Gilbertz United States
José Antonio Cortés Vázquez Spain
Stephen Bass United Kingdom
Christian Hirschi Switzerland
Michael Hibbard United States
V.C. Tassone Netherlands
Maureen H. McDonough United States
Thomas Michael Power relative to Diane C. Bates United States Diane C. Bates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Diane C. Bates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Michael Power

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Michael Power's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Michael Power with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Michael Power more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Michael Power

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Michael Power. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Michael Power. The network helps show where Thomas Michael Power may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Michael Power

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Michael Power. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Michael Power based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Michael Power. Thomas Michael Power is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 0
3
Climate change, equity, and stranded assets
20
4 12
5 0
6
The Graduate Virtual Classroom Webinar: A Collaborative and Constructivist Online Teaching Strategy
22
7
Comment recréer l’ambiance propre au séminaire dans un cours en ligne?
1
8
Designing an Online Graduate Seminar
1
9
The Economic Benefits and Costs of Frac-Sand Mining in West Central Wisconsin: Phase One of Study - General Economic & Community Overview
1
10 36
11 25
12 28
13 13
14 11
15 41
16 139
17 8
18
Lost landscapes and failed economies
64
19 49
20 3

About Thomas Michael Power

Thomas Michael Power is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Linguistics and Language, having authored 20 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (108 citations), Global and Planetary Change (172 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (168 citations). Thomas Michael Power has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joanne C. Burgess, Edward B. Barbier, Carl Folke, John B. Wright, Amitrajeet A. Batabyal, Margarida Roméro, Thérèse Laferrière, Krista Glazewski and Anthony M. Gould. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Biology, Journal of Wildlife Management and Journal of Urban Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026