Journal of Wildlife Management

11.0k papers and 370.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 11.0k papers published in Journal of Wildlife Management in the last decades have received a total of 370.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Wildlife Management usually cover Ecology (8.0k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.1k papers) and Global and Planetary Change (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4.7k papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2.7k papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (2.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Wildlife Management are Kenneth P. Burnham, Fred S. Guthery, David Anderson, Todd W. Arnold, Douglas H. Johnson, Beatrice Van Horne, Kenneth H. Pollock, Gary C. White, Paul Beier and Louis J. Verme.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Wildlife Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Wildlife Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Wildlife Management.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Wildlife Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Wildlife Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Wildlife Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Wildlife Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025