Thomas Leitch
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 10
- American and British Literature Analysis 3
- Crime and Detective Fiction Studies 2
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 2
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- Music top 10%
-
- Cinema and Media Studies 10
-
- Law in Society and Culture 3
-
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 2
-
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 2
- Co-authors
- Jo LabanyiAlistair M. DuckworthRobert StamAllen WollRobert P. KolkerMatt A. BernsteinAlexander WelshJohn Kucich
- Journals
- Adaptation (2 papers)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)The Henry James review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Leitch
17 papers receiving 124 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Literature and Literary Theory 93
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 18
- Music 10
- Communication 20
- Economics and Econometrics 53
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Leitch
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Leitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Leitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Leitch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Leitch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Leitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Leitch. The network helps show where Thomas Leitch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Leitch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 9 | Wikipedia U: Knowledge, Authority, and Liberal Education in the Digital Age | 2014 | 6 |
| 10 | Reading like adults, performing like children: Two ways of experiencing adaptations | 2012 | 0 |
| 11 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 40 | |
| 16 | Find the director and other Hitchcock games | 1991 | 6 |
| 17 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 0 |
About Thomas Leitch
Thomas Leitch is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Economics and Econometrics, Law and Communication, having authored 27 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (10 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (10 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (2 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers) and Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (93 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (18 citations), Music (10 citations), Communication (20 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (53 citations). Thomas Leitch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jo Labanyi, Alistair M. Duckworth, Robert Stam, Allen Woll, Robert P. Kolker, Matt A. Bernstein, Alexander Welsh, John Kucich, Christopher P. Ames and Robert Sklar. Their work appears in journals such as Adaptation, The Modern Language Review, The Henry James review, Literature film quarterly and Modern fiction studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.