Thomas L. Bollen
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Oncology top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Emergency Medicine top 1%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Marc G. BesselinkHjalmar C. van SantvoortHein G. GooszenOlaf J. BakkerBert van RamshorstMarja A. BoermeesterKaren D. HorvathCasper H.J. van Eijck
- Topics
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (53 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (34 papers)Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (20 papers)
- Cited by
- OncologySurgeryEmergency Medicine
- Journals
- JAMAGastroenterologyPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Bollen
62 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Surgery 3.1k
- Oncology 2.2k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 845
- Emergency Medicine 593
- Epidemiology 226
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Bollen
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Bollen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Bollen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Bollen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Bollen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Bollen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Bollen. The network helps show where Thomas L. Bollen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Bollen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Bollen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Bollen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Bollen. Thomas L. Bollen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | Impact of characteristics of organ failure and infected necrosis on mortality in necrotising pancreatitisbreakdown → | 276 |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 75 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 78 | |
| 13 | 84 | |
| 14 | Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitisbreakdown → | 463 |
| 15 | 94 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 90 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Thomas L. Bollen
Thomas L. Bollen is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 67 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (53 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (34 papers) and Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (2.2k citations), Surgery (3.1k citations) and Emergency Medicine (593 citations). Thomas L. Bollen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marc G. Besselink, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Hein G. Gooszen, Olaf J. Bakker, Bert van Ramshorst, Marja A. Boermeester, Karen D. Horvath, Casper H.J. van Eijck, Usama Ahmed Ali and Mark C. van Baal. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Gastroenterology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.