Esther C. J. Consten
- Surgery top 1%
- Oncology top 2%
- Rheumatology top 1%
- Emergency Medicine top 1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ivo A. M. J. BroedersWerner A. DraaismaMichel GagnerPaul M. VerheijenFemke J. AmelungWillem A. BemelmanJan J. van IerselWilliam B. Inabnet
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (70 papers)Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (44 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (35 papers)
- Cited by
- SurgeryEmergency MedicineOncology
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Esther C. J. Consten
127 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Surgery 2.6k
- Oncology 1.2k
- Rheumatology 610
- Emergency Medicine 514
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 407
Countries citing papers authored by Esther C. J. Consten
This map shows the geographic impact of Esther C. J. Consten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esther C. J. Consten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esther C. J. Consten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Esther C. J. Consten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esther C. J. Consten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esther C. J. Consten. The network helps show where Esther C. J. Consten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Esther C. J. Consten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Esther C. J. Consten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Esther C. J. Consten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Esther C. J. Consten. Esther C. J. Consten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | [Ileostomy versus colostomy: which is preferable?] | 7 |
| 20 | Dubbelloops ileostoma versus colostoma : wat verdient de voorkeur? | 2 |
About Esther C. J. Consten
Esther C. J. Consten is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 141 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (70 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (44 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (2.6k citations), Emergency Medicine (514 citations) and Oncology (1.2k citations). Esther C. J. Consten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ivo A. M. J. Broeders, Werner A. Draaisma, Michel Gagner, Paul M. Verheijen, Femke J. Amelung, Willem A. Bemelman, Jan J. van Iersel, William B. Inabnet, Alfons Pomp and Peter D. Siersema. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.