Rogier P. Voermans

6.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
115 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Rogier P. Voermans is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rogier P. Voermans has authored 115 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 105 papers in Surgery, 69 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 47 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Rogier P. Voermans's work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (55 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (46 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (39 papers). Rogier P. Voermans is often cited by papers focused on Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (55 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (46 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (39 papers). Rogier P. Voermans collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Belgium. Rogier P. Voermans's co-authors include Paul Fockens, Marco J. Bruno, Marc G. Besselink, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Robert C. Verdonk, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Lotte Boxhoorn, Stefan A.W. Bouwense, Marja A. Boermeester and Willem A. Bemelman and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

Rogier P. Voermans

105 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Acute pancreatitis

2020 593 citations Lotte Boxhoorn, Rogier P. Voermans et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rogier P. Voermans Netherlands	25	2.1k	1.1k	1.1k	252	155	115	2.3k
Priya A. Jamidar United States	27	1.7k 0.8×	1.2k 1.1×	1.4k 1.4×	126 0.5×	124 0.8×	100	2.2k
Toshio Tsuyuguchi Japan	30	2.8k 1.3×	1.6k 1.5×	2.4k 2.3×	193 0.8×	247 1.6×	136	3.3k
Carmelo Luigiano Italy	23	1.0k 0.5×	876 0.8×	847 0.8×	265 1.1×	195 1.3×	101	1.7k
Young Deok Cho South Korea	30	2.2k 1.0×	1.1k 1.0×	1.9k 1.8×	127 0.5×	317 2.0×	158	2.8k
Otto S. Lin United States	27	1.3k 0.6×	973 0.9×	925 0.9×	305 1.2×	358 2.3×	81	2.3k
C. McKay United Kingdom	21	1.8k 0.8×	1.3k 1.2×	516 0.5×	86 0.3×	284 1.8×	32	2.1k
Ayman El Nakeeb Egypt	28	1.7k 0.8×	909 0.8×	834 0.8×	219 0.9×	184 1.2×	101	2.0k
Arthur K.C. Li China	23	1.4k 0.7×	395 0.4×	668 0.6×	467 1.9×	207 1.3×	41	2.0k
Young Kyoung You South Korea	20	1.2k 0.6×	295 0.3×	543 0.5×	132 0.5×	259 1.7×	103	1.5k
Sadiq S. Sikora India	28	1.8k 0.8×	813 0.8×	1.1k 1.1×	69 0.3×	128 0.8×	96	2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Rogier P. Voermans

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rogier P. Voermans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rogier P. Voermans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rogier P. Voermans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rogier P. Voermans

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rogier P. Voermans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rogier P. Voermans. The network helps show where Rogier P. Voermans may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rogier P. Voermans

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rogier P. Voermans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rogier P. Voermans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rogier P. Voermans. Rogier P. Voermans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Timmerhuis, Hester C., Lotte Boxhoorn, Rogier P. Voermans, et al.. (2025). Predictors for Successful Treatment of Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis With Antibiotics Alone. Annals of Surgery. 282(5). 860–867.

Verdonk, Robert C., et al.. (2025). Acute Pancreatitis: An Update of Evidence‐Based Management and Recent Trends in Treatment Strategies. United European Gastroenterology Journal. 13(1). 97–106. 8 indexed citations

Delft, Foke van, Erwin-Jan M. van Geenen, Auke Bogte, et al.. (2025). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy results in fewer complications than percutaneous drainage following failed ERCP in malignant distal biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 57(9). 1004–1015. 1 indexed citations

Santvoort, Hjalmar van, Rogier P. Voermans, Nicholas J. Zyromski, & Ajith K. Siriwardena. (2025). Antibiotic stewardship in acute pancreatitis. British journal of surgery. 112(2). 1 indexed citations

Maida, Marcello, Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Mario Traina, et al.. (2025). Optimal timing for lumen-apposing metal stent removal following endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 57(9). 1023–1033. 1 indexed citations

Besselink, Marc G., Alessandro Bonomi, Olivier R. Busch, et al.. (2024). Recurrent cholangitis in patients with a non-stenotic hepaticojejunostomy: incidence and risk factors. HPB. 26(4). 558–564. 4 indexed citations

Smit, Egbert F., Otto van Delden, Joris I. Erdmann, et al.. (2024). High sensitivity of biliary brush cytology after optimization of protocol in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study with historical control. Endoscopy. 56(S 02). S118–S119.

Fockens, Paul, et al.. (2024). EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for primary drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction (SCORPION-II-p): a prospective pilot study using FCSEMS through LAMS. Endoscopy. 56(S 02). S108–S109. 1 indexed citations

Mohamed, Rachid, Sooraj Tejaswi, Lars Aabakken, et al.. (2024). Per-oral cholangioscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a 12-month follow-up study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(2). E237–E244.

10.

Stoop, Thomas F., Joris I. Erdmann, Freek Daams, et al.. (2024). Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Following Induction Chemotherapy: A Single-Center Experience. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 31(9). 6180–6192. 1 indexed citations

11.

Byerly, Saskya, Paul Fockens, Karen D. Horvath, et al.. (2024). A core outcome set for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma modified Delphi method consensus study. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 96(6). 965–970. 2 indexed citations

12.

Driel, Lydi M.J.W. van, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Roy S. Dwarkasing, et al.. (2024). Endoscopic ultrasound with tissue acquisition of lymph nodes in patients with potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(8). E998–E1005. 3 indexed citations

13.

Dijk, Frederike, Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta, Selma J. Lekkerkerker, et al.. (2023). Validation of combined carcinoembryonic antigen and glucose testing in pancreatic cyst fluid to differentiate mucinous from non-mucinous cysts. Surgical Endoscopy. 37(5). 3739–3746. 9 indexed citations

14.

Fockens, Paul, Marc G. Besselink, O.R. Busch, et al.. (2023). EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using single step lumen-apposing metal stents for primary drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction (SCORPION-p): a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 55(S 02). S41–S42. 3 indexed citations

15.

Vanella, Giuseppe, Giuseppe Dell’Anna, Roy L.J. van Wanrooij, et al.. (2023). Managing dysfunctions and reinterventions in endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy with lumen apposing metal stents: Illustrated technical review (with videos). Digestive Endoscopy. 36(4). 481–491. 3 indexed citations

16.

Huijgevoort, Nadine C.M. van, Selma J. Lekkerkerker, Olivier R. Busch, et al.. (2023). Diagnostic accuracy of the AGA, IAP, and European guidelines for detecting advanced neoplasia in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm/neoplasia. Pancreatology. 23(3). 251–257. 10 indexed citations

17.

Fockens, Paul, Maarten Jacobs, Nahid S.M. Montazeri, et al.. (2022). Does same session EUS-guided tissue acquisition and ERCP increase the risk of pancreatitis in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction?. HPB. 24(10). 1634–1641. 5 indexed citations

18.

Bruno, Marco J., et al.. (2022). Comparison of Intraductal RFA Plus Stent versus Stent-Only Treatment for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers. 14(9). 2079–2079. 11 indexed citations

19.

Boxhoorn, Lotte, Hester C. Timmerhuis, Marc G. Besselink, et al.. (2022). ExTENSION: Long-Term Follow-up Study of an Endoscopic versus a Surgical Step-up Approach for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis. HPB. 24. S1–S1. 1 indexed citations

20.

Acherman, Yaïr I. Z., Michel van Weeghel, Henk van Lenthe, et al.. (2021). Gallstone Formation Follows a Different Trajectory in Bariatric Patients Compared to Nonbariatric Patients. Metabolites. 11(10). 682–682. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact