Jan‐Werner Poley
- Surgery top 1%
- Oncology top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marco J. BrunoErnst J. KuipersPaul FockensCasper H.J. van EijckDjuna L. CahenMarc G. BesselinkAnja WagnerOlaf J. Bakker
- Topics
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (52 papers)Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (22 papers)Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (18 papers)
- Journals
- JAMASHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jan‐Werner Poley
83 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Surgery 1.9k
- Oncology 1.5k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 875
- Epidemiology 487
- Cancer Research 330
Countries citing papers authored by Jan‐Werner Poley
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan‐Werner Poley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan‐Werner Poley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan‐Werner Poley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan‐Werner Poley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan‐Werner Poley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan‐Werner Poley. The network helps show where Jan‐Werner Poley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan‐Werner Poley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan‐Werner Poley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan‐Werner Poley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan‐Werner Poley. Jan‐Werner Poley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | [Outbreaks related to contaminated duodenoscopes: causes and solutions]. | 1 |
| 9 | 68 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitisbreakdown → | 463 |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 58 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Jan‐Werner Poley
Jan‐Werner Poley is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 89 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (52 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (22 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.5k citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (100 citations) and Surgery (1.9k citations). Jan‐Werner Poley has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marco J. Bruno, Ernst J. Kuipers, Paul Fockens, Casper H.J. van Eijck, Djuna L. Cahen, Marc G. Besselink, Anja Wagner, Olaf J. Bakker, Sandra van Brunschot and Frank P. Vleggaar. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.