C. Dejong

2.5k total citations
28 papers, 472 citations indexed

About

C. Dejong is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Dejong has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 472 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Oncology and 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in C. Dejong's work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (8 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers). C. Dejong is often cited by papers focused on Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (8 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers). C. Dejong collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. C. Dejong's co-authors include Cor G. M. I. Baeten, Ö. Uludağ, S. M. P. Koch, Wim G. van Gemert, Geert Morren, Marc G. Besselink, Casper H.J. van Eijck, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Erwin van der Harst and Mark C. van Baal and has published in prestigious journals such as Gut, Critical Care Medicine and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

C. Dejong

27 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. Dejong Netherlands 12 381 213 140 89 77 28 472
Neal C. Ellis United States 9 467 1.2× 265 1.2× 243 1.7× 8 0.1× 76 1.0× 10 594
John T. Isler United States 8 223 0.6× 96 0.5× 154 1.1× 11 0.1× 38 0.5× 10 307
H.F. McAndrew United Kingdom 8 214 0.6× 52 0.2× 26 0.2× 84 0.9× 27 0.4× 12 320
Oğuz Ateş Türkiye 11 439 1.2× 17 0.1× 18 0.1× 114 1.3× 65 0.8× 49 514
James B. Metcalfe Canada 11 174 0.5× 88 0.4× 49 0.3× 122 1.4× 45 0.6× 22 398
Jun Kamei Japan 13 117 0.3× 105 0.5× 54 0.4× 131 1.5× 112 1.5× 64 377
J. D. JENKINS United Kingdom 10 130 0.3× 80 0.4× 63 0.5× 100 1.1× 132 1.7× 20 306
Fatih Sümer Türkiye 9 181 0.5× 14 0.1× 81 0.6× 7 0.1× 92 1.2× 73 302
Çetin Dinçel Türkiye 11 188 0.5× 66 0.3× 13 0.1× 171 1.9× 140 1.8× 39 365
F. Franchi France 5 141 0.4× 45 0.2× 22 0.2× 13 0.1× 50 0.6× 6 216

Countries citing papers authored by C. Dejong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Dejong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Dejong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Dejong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Dejong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Dejong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Dejong. The network helps show where C. Dejong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Dejong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Dejong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Dejong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Dejong. C. Dejong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kuijk, Sander M. J. van, Wouter K. G. Leclercq, Loes Janssen, et al.. (2022). A Dutch prediction tool to assess the risk of incidental gallbladder cancers after cholecystectomies for benign gallstone disease. HPB. 25(4). 409–416. 1 indexed citations
2.
Garde, E.M.W. van de, Markus W. Hollmann, Dianne de Korte‐de Boer, et al.. (2022). Validation of the PreOperative Score to predict Post-Operative Mortality (POSPOM) in Dutch non-cardiac surgery patients. BMC Anesthesiology. 22(1). 58–58. 6 indexed citations
3.
Boonen, Bas, Hans van Eijk, Dipok Kumar Dhar, et al.. (2022). Fluxomics reveals cellular and molecular basis of increased renal ammoniagenesis. npj Systems Biology and Applications. 8(1). 49–49. 1 indexed citations
4.
Nooijen, Lynn E., Carlijn I. Buis, C. Dejong, et al.. (2021). Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial of Biliary Drainage in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. HPB. 23. S687–S687.
5.
Leclercq, Wouter K. G., et al.. (2019). Histological examination of the gallbladder following routine cholecystectomy? A selective analysis is justified. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 46(4). 572–576. 4 indexed citations
6.
Leclercq, Wouter K. G., et al.. (2019). Paraganglion, a pitfall in diagnosis after regular cholecystectomy. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 65(C). 205–208. 1 indexed citations
7.
Costa, David W. da, Nicolien J. Schepers, Stefan A.W. Bouwense, et al.. (2018). Colicky pain and related complications after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis. HPB. 20(8). 745–751. 2 indexed citations
8.
Lambregts, Doenja M. J., R. S. Schnerr, Marissa Maas, et al.. (2017). Whole liver CT texture analysis to predict the development of colorectal liver metastases − a multicentre study. European Journal of Cancer. 72. S49–S49. 5 indexed citations
9.
Baal, Mark C. van, Thomas L. Bollen, Olaf J. Bakker, et al.. (2013). The role of routine fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Surgery. 155(3). 442–448. 78 indexed citations
10.
Damink, Steven W.M. Olde, et al.. (2011). To pee or not to pee. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 23(6). 449–454. 8 indexed citations
11.
Uludağ, Ö., Jarno Melenhorst, S. M. P. Koch, et al.. (2010). Sacral neuromodulation: long-term outcome and quality of life in patients with faecal incontinence. Colorectal Disease. 13(10). 1162–1166. 39 indexed citations
13.
Koch, S. M. P., et al.. (2006). Sacral neuromodulation; does it affect colonic transit time in patients with faecal incontinence?. Colorectal Disease. 8(4). 318–322. 13 indexed citations
14.
Wolters, Frank J., et al.. (2005). Infected Liver Cyst after Adrenaline Injection for Active Duodenal Ulcer. Endoscopy. 37(5). 496–496. 3 indexed citations
15.
Uludağ, Ö., S. M. P. Koch, Wim G. van Gemert, C. Dejong, & Cor G. M. I. Baeten. (2004). Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Fecal Incontinence: A Single-Center Study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 47(9). 1350–1357. 96 indexed citations
16.
Wolters, Frank J., Barbara M. Ryan, Geerard L. Beets, & C. Dejong. (2003). Delayed Massive Hemobilia After Biliary Stenting. Endoscopy. 35(11). 976–977. 20 indexed citations
17.
Uludağ, Ö., et al.. (2002). [Sacral neuromodulation is effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence with intact sphincter muscles; a prospective study].. PubMed. 146(21). 989–93. 19 indexed citations
18.
Damink, Steven W.M. Olde, C. Dejong, Nicolaas E.P. Deutz, & Peter B. Soeters. (1997). Decreased plasma and tissue isoleucine levels after simulated gastrointestinal bleeding by blood gavages in chronic portacaval shunted rats.. Gut. 40(3). 418–424. 12 indexed citations
19.
Berlo, C.L.H. van, Jos G. Maessen, C. Dejong, et al.. (1996). Lung glutamine metabolism: effects of starvation,parenteral and enteral nutrition. A study in man. Clinical Nutrition. 15(2). 86–88. 3 indexed citations
20.
Dejong, C., Nicolaas E.P. Deutz, & P.B. Soeters. (1992). A simple new method for repeated in vivo cerebral cortex flux measurement in rats.. PubMed. 42(3). 280–5. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026