Thomas Klueter

589 citations
25 papers · 420 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Klueter

23 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Thomas Klueter
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 128
  • Strategy and Management 260
  • Business and International Management 29
  • Computer Science Applications 33
  • Accounting 68
Replace Aleksios Gotsopoulos with:
Aleksios Gotsopoulos United States
Anna Arbussà Spain
Puay Khoon Toh United States
Matthias de Visser Netherlands
Raja Roy United States
Chris Zook United States
Emilia Lamberti Italy
Elena Novelli United Kingdom
Elisa Operti France
Charmianne Lemmens Netherlands
Thomas Klueter relative to Aleksios Gotsopoulos United States Aleksios Gotsopoulos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Aleksios Gotsopoulos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Klueter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Klueter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Klueter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Klueter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Klueter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Klueter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Klueter. The network helps show where Thomas Klueter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Klueter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Klueter Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Klueter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014107
2 201157
3 202055
4 202139
5 201634
6 201724
7 201922
8 201720
9 202313
10 201012
11 20218
12 20237
13 20177
14 20244
15 20182
16 20142
17 20141
18 20131
19 20121
20 20221

About Thomas Klueter

Thomas Klueter is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 25 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (17 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (10 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (9 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (5 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (4 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (128 citations), Strategy and Management (260 citations), Business and International Management (29 citations), Computer Science Applications (33 citations) and Accounting (68 citations). Thomas Klueter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rahul Kapoor, Gary Dushnitsky, Felipe Monteiro, Stefano Tasselli, Denise Dunlap, Luiz Felipe Monteiro, James M. Wilson, Lori Rosenkopf, Constance E. Helfat and Sonali Shah. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Journal of Management Studies, Strategic Management Journal, Strategy Science and Nature Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact