Thomas Hoover

20 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Thomas Hoover
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Filtration and Separation 43
  • Algebra and Number Theory 66
  • Mathematical Physics 93
  • Applied Mathematics 86
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 44
Replace Johannes Schmitt with:
Johannes Schmitt Switzerland
Yoshikazu Nakai Japan
R. Fricke Germany
R. D. Boss United States
Krzysztof P. Wojciechowski Poland
J. M. Gamboa Spain
Martin Olbrich Germany
T. K. Lim Malaysia
Jianpan Wang China
András Bíró Hungary
Thomas Hoover relative to Johannes Schmitt Switzerland Johannes Schmitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.6×
Johannes Schmitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hoover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hoover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hoover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hoover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hoover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hoover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hoover. The network helps show where Thomas Hoover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hoover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hoover Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hoover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197249
2 197342
3 198239
4 196931
5 198426
6 196423
7 197022
8 198216
9 198814
10 19777
11
19846
12 19925
13 19745
14 20024
15 19654
16 19643
17 19612
18 19742
19 19572
20 20021

About Thomas Hoover

Thomas Hoover is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Filtration and Separation, Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Spectroscopy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (6 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (6 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (4 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers) and Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (43 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (66 citations), Mathematical Physics (93 citations), Applied Mathematics (86 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (44 citations). Thomas Hoover has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Joseph F. Quinn, Alan J. Lambert, William Arveson, Aidan Hutchison, Alan Lambert, Il Bong Jung, Don Hadwin, John Davies, Peter Rowley and Javad Tavakoli. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Duke Mathematical Journal and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact