Thomas Hempell

558 total citations
11 papers, 325 citations indexed

About

Thomas Hempell is a scholar working on Media Technology, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Hempell has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 325 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Media Technology, 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 2 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Thomas Hempell's work include ICT Impact and Policies (7 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (7 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (3 papers). Thomas Hempell is often cited by papers focused on ICT Impact and Policies (7 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (7 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (3 papers). Thomas Hempell collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Thomas Hempell's co-authors include Thomas Zwick and George van Leeuwen and has published in prestigious journals such as Empirical Economics, Economics of Innovation and New Technology and Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).

In The Last Decade

Thomas Hempell

10 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Hempell Germany	9	203	122	68	35	29	11	325
David T. Methé Japan	8	97 0.5×	263 2.2×	56 0.8×	30 0.9×	38 1.3×	15	385
Gordon J. Klein Germany	7	248 1.2×	119 1.0×	126 1.9×	9 0.3×	36 1.2×	14	347
Silvia Muzi United States	8	210 1.0×	75 0.6×	10 0.1×	44 1.3×	56 1.9×	17	369
Eirik Gaard Kristiansen Norway	11	163 0.8×	117 1.0×	28 0.4×	10 0.3×	17 0.6×	25	389
I. M. Pandey India	16	98 0.5×	210 1.7×	7 0.1×	64 1.8×	16 0.6×	31	526
Hodaka Morita Japan	12	345 1.7×	169 1.4×	13 0.2×	22 0.6×	15 0.5×	39	451
Sue Bridgewater United Kingdom	9	84 0.4×	216 1.8×	16 0.2×	10 0.3×	129 4.4×	16	355
Gary Chapman United Kingdom	9	167 0.8×	100 0.8×	42 0.6×	3 0.1×	25 0.9×	22	342
Mouna Amari Tunisia	10	205 1.0×	27 0.2×	22 0.3×	53 1.5×	34 1.2×	13	363
Lina Khan United States	8	124 0.6×	142 1.2×	24 0.4×	10 0.3×	83 2.9×	13	327

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hempell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hempell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hempell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hempell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hempell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hempell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hempell. The network helps show where Thomas Hempell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Hempell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Hempell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Hempell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Hempell. Thomas Hempell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Hempell, Thomas & Thomas Zwick. (2008). NEW TECHNOLOGY, WORK ORGANISATION, AND INNOVATION. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 17(4). 331–354. 82 indexed citations

2.

Hempell, Thomas. (2006). Computers and Productivity. Physica-Verlag eBooks.

3.

Hempell, Thomas. (2005). Computers and Productivity: How Firms Make a General Purpose Technology Work (ZEW Economic Studies). Physica-Verlag eBooks. 2 indexed citations

4.

Hempell, Thomas. (2005). What’s spurious, what’s real? Measuring the productivity impacts of ICT at the firm-level. Empirical Economics. 30(2). 427–464. 78 indexed citations

5.

Hempell, Thomas & Thomas Zwick. (2005). Technology Use, Organisational Flexibility and Innovation: Evidence for Germany. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15 indexed citations

6.

Hempell, Thomas. (2005). Computers and Productivity: How Firms Make a General Purpose Technology Work. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 13 indexed citations

7.

Hempell, Thomas. (2005). Does experience matter? innovations and the productivity of information and communication technologies in German services. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 14(4). 277–303. 50 indexed citations

8.

Hempell, Thomas, et al.. (2004). ICT, Innovation and Business Performance in Services: Evidence for Germany and the Netherlands. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15 indexed citations

9.

Hempell, Thomas. (2003). Do Computers Call for Training? Firm-level Evidence onComplementarities Between ICT and Human Capital Investments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 35 indexed citations

10.

Hempell, Thomas. (2002). What's Spurious, What's Real? Measuring the Productivity Impacts of ICT at the Firm-Level. SSRN Electronic Journal. 21 indexed citations

11.

Hempell, Thomas. (2002). Does Experience Matter? Innovations and the Productivity of ICT in German Services. SSRN Electronic Journal. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact