Lina Khan

1.4k citations
13 papers · 327 indexed · h-index 8
Topics
Merger and Competition Analysis (4 papers)Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers)Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Lina Khan

12 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Lina Khan
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Strategy and Management 142
  • Economics and Econometrics 124
  • Sociology and Political Science 83
  • Marketing 64
  • Political Science and International Relations 48
Replace Emilios Avgouleas with:
Emilios Avgouleas United Kingdom
Paolo Buccirossi Italy
Timo Seidl Austria
Timothy J. Muris United States
Joseph A. Grundfest United States
Anupriya Khan India
Johannes Moenius United States
Riad A. Ajami United States
Lucia Dalla Pellegrina Italy
Anwar Hasan Abdullah Othman Malaysia
Lina Khan relative to Emilios Avgouleas United Kingdom Emilios Avgouleas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Emilios Avgouleas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lina Khan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lina Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lina Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lina Khan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lina Khan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lina Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lina Khan. The network helps show where Lina Khan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lina Khan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lina Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lina Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lina Khan. Lina Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2
The Case for 'Unfair Methods of Competition' Rulemaking
8
3
A Skeptical View of Information Fiduciaries
11
4 1
5 0
6
Sources of Tech Platform Power
29
7
The Ideological Roots of America's Market Power Problem
19
8 58
9
Arbitration as Wealth Transfer
1
10
Market Power and Inequality: The Antitrust Counterrevolution and Its Discontents
58
11
Amazon's Antitrust Paradox
122
12
Market Structure and Political Law: A Taxonomy of Power
7
13 12

About Lina Khan

Lina Khan is a scholar working on Law, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (4 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (142 citations), Marketing (64 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (124 citations). Lina Khan has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David E. Pozen, Rohit Chopra and Deepak Gupta. Their work appears in journals such as The Yale Law Journal, Harvard Law Review and The University of Chicago Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026