Thomas F. O’Dea

405 citations
18 papers · 226 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas F. O’Dea

13 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers

Thomas F. O’Dea
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Health 65
  • Sociology and Political Science 145
  • History 29
  • Religious studies 10
  • Political Science and International Relations 33
Replace Ronald L. Johnstone with:
Ronald L. Johnstone United States
Rex Warner United States
Bruce E. Steiner United States
Michael P. Hornsby‐Smith United Kingdom
Fred Kniss United States
Michael C. Coleman Finland
C. J. Nuesse United States
Michael W. Hughey United States
Liliane Voyé Belgium
Arvarh E. Strickland United States
Thomas F. O’Dea relative to Ronald L. Johnstone United States Ronald L. Johnstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Ronald L. Johnstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. O’Dea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. O’Dea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. O’Dea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. O’Dea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. O’Dea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. O’Dea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. O’Dea. The network helps show where Thomas F. O’Dea may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Thomas F. O’Dea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas F. O’Dea Line = papers co-authored together Thomas F. O’Dea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 195459
2 196651
3 196128
4
The Catholic crisis
196822
5 196017
6 195413
7 195311
8 195810
9
Sociologia della religione
19685
10
Sociology and the Study of Religion: Theory, Research, Interpretation
19704
11 19582
12 19561
13 19581
14 19661
15
Sosiologi agama : suatu pengenalan awal / Thomas F. O'dea
19871
16 19700
17 19570
18 19550

About Thomas F. O’Dea

Thomas F. O’Dea is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Religious studies and Philosophy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (8 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers), Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education (1 paper), Cultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia (1 paper) and Study and Philosophy of Religion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (65 citations), Sociology and Political Science (145 citations), History (29 citations), Religious studies (10 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (33 citations). Thomas F. O’Dea has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bryan Wilson, Charles Y. Glock, Rodney Stark, Evon Z. Vogt, John J. Kane and Robert M. Barry. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, American Quarterly, Review of Religious Research and American Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact