John J. Kane

893 citations
25 papers · 629 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

John J. Kane

18 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers

John J. Kane
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 113
  • Health 53
  • Inorganic Chemistry 85
  • Sociology and Political Science 257
  • Biomaterials 77
Replace Richard Lincoln with:
Richard Lincoln Canada
Peter R. Neumann Germany
Walter Schäfer Germany
Karla A. Erickson United States
Louise Johnson Australia
Robert R. Dykstra United States
David Jones United Kingdom
Kenneth E. Hyde United States
José Félix Tezanos Tortajada Spain
Robert L. Montgomery United States
John J. Kane relative to Richard Lincoln Canada Richard Lincoln's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Richard Lincoln · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Kane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Kane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Kane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Kane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Kane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Kane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Kane. The network helps show where John J. Kane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside John J. Kane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Kane Line = papers co-authored together John J. Kane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1956283
2 1995121
3 1997117
4 195126
5 200724
6 200111
7 19576
8 19526
9 19526
10 19615
11 19515
12 19564
13 19523
14 19582
15 19532
16 19711
17 19521
18 19561
19 19621
20 19551

About John J. Kane

John J. Kane is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Religious studies, having authored 25 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (1 paper), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (1 paper) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (113 citations), Health (53 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (85 citations), Sociology and Political Science (257 citations) and Biomaterials (77 citations). John J. Kane has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Will Herberg, Joseph W. Lauher, Frank W. Fowler, Tam L. Nguyen, Leticia M. Toledo, Harvey J. Locke, Dirk Schweitzer, Martin Tenniswood, Paul Helquist and Daniel Strand. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Organic Letters, The Review of Politics and Molecular crystals and liquid crystals science technology. Section A, Molecular crystals and liquid crystals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact