Thomas D. Lancaster

1000 citations
31 papers · 674 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas D. Lancaster

28 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

Thomas D. Lancaster
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Political Science and International Relations 475
  • Strategy and Management 132
  • Gender Studies 62
  • Law 61
  • Communication 43
Replace Svante Ersson with:
Svante Ersson Sweden
Steven R. Reed Japan
Dimitri Landa United States
Barry S. Rundquist United States
André Kaiser Germany
Guillermo Rosas United States
Gregory J. Wawro United States
Juliet Lodge United Kingdom
John P. Frendreis United States
Scott Basinger United States
Thomas D. Lancaster relative to Svante Ersson Sweden Svante Ersson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Svante Ersson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Lancaster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Lancaster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Lancaster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Lancaster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Lancaster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Lancaster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Lancaster. The network helps show where Thomas D. Lancaster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Lancaster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Lancaster Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Lancaster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990162
2 1986131
3 1997100
4 200150
5 198632
6 198927
7 201726
8 198923
9 199916
10 199916
11 198914
12 201714
13 19879
14
Politics and Change in Spain
19858
15 19968
16
Compounded representation in West European federations
19997
17 19976
18 19995
19 20145
20 19943

About Thomas D. Lancaster

Thomas D. Lancaster is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Systems and Governance (11 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (5 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (2 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (2 papers) and Corruption and Economic Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (475 citations), Strategy and Management (132 citations), Gender Studies (62 citations), Law (61 citations) and Communication (43 citations). Thomas D. Lancaster has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gabriella R. Montinola, Michael S. Lewis‐Beck, Micheal W. Giles, Robert S. Erikson, David W. Romero and Gary Prévost. Their work appears in journals such as Publius The Journal of Federalism, West European Politics, American Political Science Review, The Journal of Politics and Comparative Political Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact