John P. Frendreis

1.2k total citations
34 papers, 642 citations indexed

About

John P. Frendreis is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, John P. Frendreis has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 642 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in John P. Frendreis's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers) and Policy Transfer and Learning (6 papers). John P. Frendreis is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers) and Policy Transfer and Learning (6 papers). John P. Frendreis collaborates with scholars based in United States. John P. Frendreis's co-authors include Eric C. Browne, Dennis W. Gleiber, Raymond Tatalovich, James L. Gibson, Kaare W. Strøm, Chris Dolan, Shannon Jenkins, Richard D. Bingham and Christopher A. Simon and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.

In The Last Decade

John P. Frendreis

31 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John P. Frendreis United States 13 481 222 180 163 49 34 642
Thomas D. Lancaster United States 12 472 1.0× 161 0.7× 249 1.4× 132 0.8× 43 0.9× 31 672
Patrick Dunleavy United Kingdom 2 390 0.8× 152 0.7× 130 0.7× 69 0.4× 36 0.7× 2 496
Norman J. Ornstein United States 11 484 1.0× 149 0.7× 124 0.7× 152 0.9× 107 2.2× 48 655
Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca Spain 16 584 1.2× 85 0.4× 528 2.9× 105 0.6× 36 0.7× 61 1.0k
Stephen A. Borrelli United States 13 415 0.9× 216 1.0× 132 0.7× 93 0.6× 68 1.4× 34 522
Leonard J. Schoppa United States 12 380 0.8× 44 0.2× 206 1.1× 101 0.6× 15 0.3× 25 581
Svante Ersson Sweden 14 508 1.1× 111 0.5× 235 1.3× 112 0.7× 35 0.7× 43 653
Barbara Hinckley United States 15 550 1.1× 227 1.0× 193 1.1× 155 1.0× 92 1.9× 32 676
Klaus von Beyme Germany 19 912 1.9× 91 0.4× 432 2.4× 176 1.1× 63 1.3× 132 1.2k
Peter H. Merkl United States 16 705 1.5× 45 0.2× 415 2.3× 115 0.7× 75 1.5× 86 956

Countries citing papers authored by John P. Frendreis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John P. Frendreis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John P. Frendreis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John P. Frendreis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John P. Frendreis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John P. Frendreis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John P. Frendreis. The network helps show where John P. Frendreis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John P. Frendreis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John P. Frendreis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John P. Frendreis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John P. Frendreis. John P. Frendreis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Frendreis, John P., et al.. (2021). Direct democracy, policy diffusion, and medicalized marijuana. Politics and the Life Sciences. 40(1). 72–82. 1 indexed citations
2.
Simon, Christopher A., John P. Frendreis, & Raymond Tatalovich. (2020). Economics, morality, or race: Referenda voting on tribal gaming legalization. The Social Science Journal. 60(3). 491–505.
3.
Frendreis, John P. & Raymond Tatalovich. (2019). Postmaterialism and referenda voting to legalize marijuana. International Journal of Drug Policy. 75. 102595–102595. 6 indexed citations
4.
Frendreis, John P. & Raymond Tatalovich. (2012). Secularization, Modernization, or Population Change: Explaining the Decline of Prohibition in theUnitedStates. Social Science Quarterly. 94(2). 379–394. 4 indexed citations
5.
Frendreis, John P. & Raymond Tatalovich. (2011). Validating Protestant Denominational Classifications Using the Chaves Inerrancy Scale. Politics and Religion. 4(2). 355–365. 6 indexed citations
6.
Dolan, Chris, John P. Frendreis, & Raymond Tatalovich. (2009). A Presidential Economic Scorecard: Performance and Perception. PS Political Science & Politics. 42(4). 689–694. 9 indexed citations
7.
Jenkins, Shannon, et al.. (2006). Thinking Outside the Quality Box: The Impact of Candidate Motivations on Election Outcomes. American Review of Politics. 27. 21–43. 2 indexed citations
8.
Frendreis, John P., et al.. (2001). Predicting Legislative Output in the First One-Hundred Days, 1897-1995. Political Research Quarterly. 54(4). 853–870. 21 indexed citations
9.
Frendreis, John P. & Raymond Tatalovich. (2000). Accuracy and Bias in Macroeconomic Forecasting by the Administration, the CBO, and the Federal Reserve Board. Polity. 32(4). 623–632. 19 indexed citations
10.
Frendreis, John P. & Raymond Tatalovich. (1997). Who supports English-only language laws ? Evidence from the 1992 National Election Study. Social Science Quarterly. 78(2). 354–368. 38 indexed citations
11.
Gibson, James L., et al.. (1989). Party Dynamics in the 1980s: Change in County Party Organizational Strength, 1980-1984. American Journal of Political Science. 33(1). 67–67. 27 indexed citations
12.
Strøm, Kaare W., et al.. (1988). Contending Models of Cabinet Stability. American Political Science Review. 82(3). 923–941. 45 indexed citations
13.
Frendreis, John P., et al.. (1988). A model of decision making and the public service professional. Political Behavior. 10(1). 77–93. 3 indexed citations
14.
Frendreis, John P., Dennis W. Gleiber, & Eric C. Browne. (1986). The Study of Cabinet Dissolutions in Parliamentary Democracies. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 11(4). 619–619. 16 indexed citations
15.
Browne, Eric C., John P. Frendreis, & Dennis W. Gleiber. (1986). The Process of Cabinet Dissolution: An Exponential Model of Duration and Stability in Western Democracies. American Journal of Political Science. 30(3). 628–628. 87 indexed citations
16.
Browne, Eric C., John P. Frendreis, & Dennis W. Gleiber. (1984). An “Events” Approach to the Problem of Cabinet Stability. Comparative Political Studies. 17(2). 167–197. 87 indexed citations
17.
Frendreis, John P.. (1983). Innovation: A Practice in Search of a Theory, or so What Does All This Research Mean, Anyway?. Journal of Urban Affairs. 5(2). 109–122. 1 indexed citations
18.
Browne, Eric C. & John P. Frendreis. (1980). Allocating Coalition Payoffs by Conventional Norm: An Assessment of the Evidence from Cabinet Coalition Situations. American Journal of Political Science. 24(4). 753–753. 85 indexed citations
19.
Frendreis, John P.. (1978). Innovation Characteristics as Correlates of Innovation Adoption in American Cities. 12(2). 67–86. 5 indexed citations
20.
Bingham, Richard D., et al.. (1978). The Nominating Process in Nonpartisan Elections: Petition Signing as an Act of Support. The Journal of Politics. 40(4). 1044–1053. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas D. Lancaster Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patrick Dunleavy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Norman J. Ornstein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen A. Borrelli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leonard J. Schoppa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Svante Ersson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Barbara Hinckley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Klaus von Beyme Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter H. Merkl
Rankless by CCL
2026