Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies.
19941.5k citationsRobert S. Erikson et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Robert S. Erikson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert S. Erikson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert S. Erikson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert S. Erikson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert S. Erikson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert S. Erikson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert S. Erikson. The network helps show where Robert S. Erikson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert S. Erikson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert S. Erikson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert S. Erikson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert S. Erikson. Robert S. Erikson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rudolphi, Frida & Robert S. Erikson. (2010). Change in Social Selection to Upper Secondary School - Primary and Secondary Effects in Sweden. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
8.
Bafumi, Joseph, Robert S. Erikson, & Christopher Wlezien. (2010). Forecasting the House of Representatives' Seat Division in the 2010 Midterm Election. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Erikson, Robert S. & Christopher Wlezien. (2009). Are Political Markets Really Superior to Polls as Election Predictors. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Hughes, William, et al.. (2005). FAA Tests E- and H-field Antennas to Characterize Improved Loran-C Availability During P-Static Events. 551–568.1 indexed citations
13.
MacKuen, Michael, James Stimson, & Robert S. Erikson. (2003). Electoral Accountability and the Efficacy of the Political System in the United States: A Counterfactual Analysis. Revue française de science politique. 53(6). 887–909.1 indexed citations
14.
Erikson, Robert S. & Jan Ö. Jönsson. (2002). Varför består den sociala snedrekryteringen. Bulletin Monumental. 7(3). 210.5 indexed citations
15.
Erikson, Robert S., et al.. (2001). Welfare in transition : a survey of living conditions in Sweden, 1968-1981.57 indexed citations
16.
Erikson, Robert S. & Jan Ö. Jönsson. (1996). Can education be equalized? : the Swedish case in comparative perspective.474 indexed citations
17.
Erikson, Robert S.. (1987). Welfare in transition.47 indexed citations
18.
Erikson, Robert S.. (1987). The Scandinavian model : welfare states and welfare research.151 indexed citations
Hopkins, Raymond F., Richard W. Mansbach, Robert S. Erikson, et al.. (1972). PSR volume 66 issue 4 Cover and Front matter. American Political Science Review. 66(4). f1–f9.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.