Comparative Political Studies
About
In The Last Decade
Comparative Political Studies
2.0k papers receiving 78.3k citations
Fields of papers published in Comparative Political Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Political Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Political Studies.
Countries where authors publish in Comparative Political Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Political Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Political Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Political Studies more than expected).
- “Effective” Number of Parties (1979)
- Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? (2002)
- Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities (2000)
- The Invisible Hand of Democracy (2001)
- Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule (2008)
- Of Time and Partisan Stability (1969)
- II. The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research (1975)
- Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China (2011)
- Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration (2015)
- Democracy, Autocracy, and Expropriation of Foreign Direct Investment (2009)
- Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism (2002)
- Obstinate and Inefficient: Why Member States Do Not Comply With European Law (2010)
- Changing Values in Advanced Industrial Societies (1982)
- From Socialism to Social Democracy (2004)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.