Thomas D. Hill

421 citations
66 papers · 163 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Classics top 1%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
  • History top 2%
    • Historical Studies of British Isles
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

Thomas D. Hill

38 papers receiving 96 citations

Peers

Thomas D. Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Classics 121
  • History 61
  • Language and Linguistics 46
  • Literature and Literary Theory 20
  • Anthropology 13
Replace Daniel G. Calder with:
Daniel G. Calder United States
Michael W. Herren Canada
M. C. Seymour United Kingdom
Charlotte C. Morse United States
Robert W. Hanning United States
Snorri Sturluson
Roger Sherman Loomis United States
Antonia Gransden United Kingdom
Bernard F. Huppé
Suzanne Conklin Akbari Canada
Thomas D. Hill relative to Daniel G. Calder United States Daniel G. Calder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Daniel G. Calder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Hill. The network helps show where Thomas D. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Hill Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198225
2 199012
3
Via crucis : essays on early medieval sources and ideas : in memory of J.E. Cross
200211
4 19718
5 19818
6 19796
7 20145
8 20045
9 19725
10 19884
11 19704
12 19774
13 19663
14 19873
15 19883
16 19873
17 19933
18 19713
19 20023
20 20123

About Thomas D. Hill

Thomas D. Hill is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics, History, Literature and Literary Theory and Anthropology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (34 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (17 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (7 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (6 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (121 citations), History (61 citations), Language and Linguistics (46 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations) and Anthropology (13 citations). Thomas D. Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas N. Hall, Charles D. Wright, Paul E. Szarmach, Lara Latimer, Jamie Dollahite, Laura Thomas, Brian Wansink, David R. Just and Martin Camargo. Their work appears in journals such as Notes and Queries, Neophilologus, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, Speculum and Traditio.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact